You Have Options: Implementing and evaluating a contraceptive choice social marketing campaign
- PMID: 36204498
- PMCID: PMC9413606
- DOI: 10.1177/23992026211003499
You Have Options: Implementing and evaluating a contraceptive choice social marketing campaign
Abstract
Background: Up to two-thirds of pregnancies among young, unmarried women in the United States are unintended, despite increased access to highly effective contraceptive options.
Aim: This study implemented and evaluated a social marketing campaign designed to increase access to a full range of contraceptive methods among women aged 18-24 years on a southeastern university campus.
Methods: Researchers partnered with Choose Well and Student Health Services to design, implement, and evaluate You Have Options, a 10-week multi-media social marketing campaign. The campaign aimed to raise awareness, increase knowledge, and improve access to contraceptive options, including long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) methods among college women. A pretest-posttest web-based survey design measured campaign awareness and recognition, as well as attitudes, subjective norms, and behavior.
Results: Participants demonstrated a significant increase in knowledge about intrauterine devices (IUDs) between pretest (M = 2.66, SD = 1.30) and posttest (M = 3.06; SD = 1.96); t(671) = -2.60, p < .01). Analysis revealed that frequent exposure to the campaign prompted participants to engage in discussions about LARC with friends (p < .05). In addition, 20- to 24-year-olds who reported seeing the campaign messages were more likely to seek out information (p < .01) and adopt a LARC method (p = .001) than 18- or 19-year-olds who saw the campaign messages.
Conclusion: Findings from the study offer practical recommendations for implementing social marketing campaigns aimed at increasing access to LARC and reducing unintended pregnancy.
Keywords: Contraception; campaigns; health communication; social marketing.
© The Author(s) 2021.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Similar articles
-
Evaluating the Whoops Proof S.C. Campaign: A Pair-Matched Group Pretest-Posttest Quasi-experimental Study.Matern Child Health J. 2019 Aug;23(8):1036-1047. doi: 10.1007/s10995-018-02729-6. Matern Child Health J. 2019. PMID: 30707341
-
Integrating Pregnancy Ambivalence and Effectiveness in Contraceptive Choice.Health Commun. 2017 Jul;32(7):820-827. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1172294. Epub 2016 Jul 15. Health Commun. 2017. PMID: 27420543
-
"It Makes You Rethink Your Choice of the Pill": Theory-Based Formative Research to Design a Contraceptive Choice Campaign.J Health Commun. 2015;20(11):1346-54. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1018650. Epub 2015 Jul 15. J Health Commun. 2015. PMID: 26176271
-
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. PMID: 26606712 English, French.
-
Current challenges in contraception in adolescents and young women.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Mar;25 Suppl 1:S1-10. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32835e06fd. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 23370330 Review.
References
-
- Walsh-Buhi ER, Helmy HL. Trends in long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) use, LARC use predictors, and dual-method use among a national sample of college women. J Am College Health 2018; 66(4): 225–236. - PubMed
-
- Guttmacher Institute. Contraceptive use in the United States, 2018, Guttmacher Institute, https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/contraceptive-use-united-states (accessed 13 February 2019).
-
- ACOG. Adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices, 2012, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists website, http://www.acog.Org/Resources_And_Publications/Committee_Opinions/Commit... (accessed 21 July 2013).
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources