A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials in Uveitis: Lessons Learned
- PMID: 36204817
- PMCID: PMC10326894
- DOI: 10.1080/09286586.2022.2131837
A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials in Uveitis: Lessons Learned
Abstract
Purpose: Clinical trials in uveitis have led to the expansion of therapeutic options for the management of non-infectious uveitis. The purpose of this systematic review is to investigate why some clinical trials have yielded successful results and regulatory approval of new therapies, and some have not.
Methods: A systematic literature search of the Pubmed/MEDLINE database and clinicaltrials.gov was performed from 2006 to 2021, according to the PRISMA guidelines. Phase III clinical trials of systemic and local therapies in adults with non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis were included.
Results: A total of 79 clinical trials were collected from ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed/MEDLINE database search. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 14 clinical trials were included.
Conclusion: This review summarizes the study design, outcome measures, and results of recent phase III trials in non-infectious uveitis, in the interest of understanding limitations and rethinking new methods of defining endpoints in clinical trial design.
Keywords: clinical trials; intermediate uveitis; non-infectious; outcome measures; panuveitis; phase 3; posterior uveitis; treatment.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;134:178–189. - PubMed
-
- Mackensen F, Jakob E, Springer C, et al. Interferon versus methotrexate in intermediate uveitis with macular edema: results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156(3):478–486 e471. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources