Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1987;57(1-2):137-44.
doi: 10.1007/BF00318723.

The human arm as a redundant manipulator: the control of path and joint angles

Free article

The human arm as a redundant manipulator: the control of path and joint angles

H Cruse et al. Biol Cybern. 1987.
Free article

Abstract

The movements studied involved moving the tip of a pointer attached to the hand from a given starting point to a given end point in a horizontal plane. Three joints--the shoulder, elbow and wrist--were free to move. Thus the system represented a redundant manipulator. The coordination of the movements of the three joints was recorded and analyzed. The study concerned how the joints are controlled during a movement. The results are used to evaluate several current hypotheses for motor control. Basically, the incremental changes are calculated so as to move the tip of the manipulator along a straight line in the workspace. The values of the individual joints seem to be determined as follows. Starting from the initial values the incremental changes in the three joint angles represent a compromise between two criteria: 1) the amount of the angular change should be about the same in the three joints, and 2) the angular changes should minimize the total cost of the arm position as determined by cost functions defined for each joint as a function of angle. By itself, this mechanism would produce strongly curved trajectories in joint space which could include additional acceleration and deceleration in a joint. These are reduced by the influence of a third criterion which fits with the mass-spring hypothesis. Thus the path is calculated as a compromise between a straight line in workspace and a straight line in joint space. The latter can produce curved paths in the workspace such as were actually found in the experiments. A model calculation shows that these hypotheses can qualitatively describe the experimental findings.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Mot Behav. 1986 Sep;18(3):261-78 - PubMed
    1. Biol Cybern. 1982;44(1):67-77 - PubMed
    1. J Neurosci. 1985 Sep;5(9):2318-30 - PubMed
    1. Brain. 1982 Jun;105(Pt 2):331-48 - PubMed
    1. Exp Brain Res. 1981;42(2):223-7 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources