Considerations for determining safety of probiotics: A USP perspective
- PMID: 36206977
- PMCID: PMC10292223
- DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105266
Considerations for determining safety of probiotics: A USP perspective
Abstract
A history of safe use is a backbone of safety assessments for many current probiotic species, however, there is no global harmonization regarding requirements for establishing probiotic safety for use in foods and supplements. As probiotic manufacturers are increasingly seeking to use new strains, novel species, and next-generation probiotics, justification based on a significant history of use may be challenged. There are efforts underway by a variety of stakeholders, including the United States Pharmacopeia (USP), to develop best practices guidelines for assessing the quality and safety of probiotics. A current initiative of the USP seeks to provide expert advice specific to safety considerations for probiotics. Toward this goal, this review provides a helpful summary guide to global regulatory guidelines. We question the suitability of traditional animal toxicology studies designed for testing chemicals for relevance in assessing probiotic safety. This includes discussion of the use of excessive dose levels, the length of repeated dose toxicity studies needed, and the most suitable animal species used in toxicology studies. In addition, the importance of proper manufacturing practices with regard to final product safety are also included. Thus, an outline of essential parameters of a comprehensive safety assessment for a probiotic are provided.
Keywords: Animal testing; Dietary supplements; Next-generation probiotics; Probiotics; Safety; Toxicology; United States Pharmacopeia.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures
References
-
- Agencia Nacional de Vigilancia Sanitaria (ANVISA), 2018. Resolution of the Collegiate Board RDC No. 241. RESOLUTION of the COLLEGIATE BOARD RDC No. 241. OF JULY 26, 2018 - National Press (in.gov.br). (Accessed 20 May 2022).
-
- Alcock BP, Raphenya AR, Lau TTY, Tsang KK, Bouchard M, Edalatmand A, Huynh W, Nguyen ALV, Cheng AA, Liu S, Min SY, Miroshnichenko A, Tran HK, Werfalli RE, Nasir JA, Oloni M, Speicher DJ, Florescu A, Singh B, Faltyn M, Hernandez-Koutoucheva A, Sharma AN, Bordeleau E, Pawlowski AC, Zubyk H, Dooley D, Griffiths E, Maguire F, Winsor GL, Beiko RG, Brinkman FSL, Hsiao WWL, Domselaar GV, McArthur AG, 2020. Card 2020: antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 48 (D1), D517–d525. 10.1093/nar/gkz935. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Alisi A, Bedogni G, Baviera G, Giorgio V, Porro E, Paris C, Giammaria P, Reali L, Anania F, Nobili V, 2014. Randomised clinical trial: the beneficial effects of VSL#3 in obese children with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther 39, 1276–1285. 10.1111/apt.12758. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Further reading
-
- European Medicines Agency (Ema), 1996. ICH topic Q5C quality of biotechnological products: stability testing of biotechnological/biological products. Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/ich-topic-q-.... (Accessed 6 June 2021).
-
- European Medicines Agency (Ema), 2003. ICH topic Q1E evaluation of stability data. Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/ich-q-1-e-ev.... (Accessed 6 June 2021).
-
- European Pharmacopeia, 2019a. Live Biotherapeutic Products for Human Use, 04/2019/3053.
-
- European Pharmacopeia, 2019b. Microbiological Examination of Live Biotherapeutic Products: Tests for Specified Micro-organisms, 04/2019/20638.
-
- Medical Control Counsel (MCC), 2016. Complementary Medicines – Health Supplements Safety and Efficacy, 7.04 SE Health Supplements June 16, v2.doc. 7.04_CM_SE_Health_Supplements_Jun20_v4.pdf (sahpra.org.za).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
