Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 7;12(10):e065850.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065850.

Flow cytometry lyophilised-reagent tube for quantifying peripheral blood neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression in myelodysplastic syndromes (MPO-MDS-Develop): protocol for a diagnostic accuracy study

Affiliations

Flow cytometry lyophilised-reagent tube for quantifying peripheral blood neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression in myelodysplastic syndromes (MPO-MDS-Develop): protocol for a diagnostic accuracy study

Tatiana Raskovalova et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Suspicion of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is the most common reason for bone marrow aspirate in elderly patients. Peripheral blood neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression quantified by flow cytometric analysis might rule out MDS for up to 35% of patients referred for suspected disease, without requiring bone marrow aspiration. Yet laboratory-developed liquid antibody cocktails have practical limitations, because of lack of standardisation and poor stability. This research project aims to estimate the level of agreement and comparative accuracy between a single-use flow cytometry tube of lyophilised reagents (BD Lyotube Stain 468) and its laboratory-developed liquid reagent counterpart in quantifying peripheral blood neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression, among adult patients referred for suspected MDS.

Methods and analysis: The MPO-MDS-Develop project is a cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study of two index tests by comparison with a reference standard in consecutive unselected adult patients conducted at a single university hospital. Flow cytometry analysis of peripheral blood samples will be performed by independent operators blinded to the reference diagnosis, using either Lyotube Stain 468 or laboratory-developed liquid reagent cocktail. The reference diagnosis of MDS will be established by cytomorphological evaluation of bone marrow aspirate by two independent haematopathologists blinded to the index test results. Morphologic assessment will be complemented by bone marrow flow cytometric score, karyotype and targeted next-generation sequencing panel of 43 genes, where relevant. The target sample size is 103 patients.

Ethics and dissemination: An institutional review board (Comité de Protection des Personnes Sud Est III, Lyon, France) approved the protocol prior to study initiation (reference number: 2020-028-B). Participants will be recruited using an opt-out approach. Efforts will be made to release the primary results within 6 months of study completion.

Trial registration number: NCT04399018.

Keywords: immunology; leukaemia; statistics & research methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Gating strategy for quantifying peripheral blood neutrophil myeloperoxidase expression. Panel A: Singlet gate. Panel B: FSC-SSC leucocytes. Panel C: CD45 positive gate. Panel D: Population of granulocytes (CD15+ CD14-), monocytes (CD14+CD15dim/-), and lymphocytes (CD14-CD15-). Panel E: Population of eosinophils (CD45high+ CD16low). Panel F: Population of mature neutrophils (CD16+CD11b+). Panel G: MPO expression of mature neutrophils. Mature neutrophils were individualized by Boolean intersections as follows: [CD15+ CD14−] (D) AND NOT [CD45high CD16 low] (E) AND NOT [CD14+ CD15low/−] (D) AND NOT [CD15− CD14−] (D) AND [CD16+ CD11b+] (F). CD, cluster of differentiation; FSC-H, forward scatter height; FSC-A, forward scatter area; MPO, myeloperoxidase; SSC-A, side scatter area; SSC-H, side scatter height.

References

    1. Cazzola M. Myelodysplastic syndromes. N Engl J Med 2020;383:1358–74. 10.1056/NEJMra1904794 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gondek LP, DeZern AE. Assessing clonal haematopoiesis: clinical burdens and benefits of diagnosing myelodysplastic syndrome precursor states. Lancet Haematol 2020;7:e73–81. 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30211-X - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nachtkamp K, Stark R, Strupp C, et al. . Causes of death in 2877 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Ann Hematol 2016;95:937–44. 10.1007/s00277-016-2649-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zeidan AM, Shallis RM, Wang R, et al. . Epidemiology of myelodysplastic syndromes: why characterizing the beast is a prerequisite to taming it. Blood Rev 2019;34:1–15. 10.1016/j.blre.2018.09.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fenaux P, Haase D, Santini V, et al. . Myelodysplastic syndromes: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†☆. Ann Oncol 2021;32:142–56. 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.11.002 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data