Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec;407(8):3377-3386.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02703-5. Epub 2022 Oct 8.

C-reactive protein identifies patients at low risk of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy

Affiliations

C-reactive protein identifies patients at low risk of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy

Paul Rat et al. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: Fast-track protocols are increasingly used after digestive surgery. After esophagectomy, the gravity and the fear of anastomotic leak may be an obstacle to generalization of such protocols. C-reactive protein (CRP) might be a reliable tool to identify patients at low risk of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy, so that they can be safely included in a fast-track program. The aim of our retrospective bicentric study is to evaluate the interest of C-reactive protein measurement for the early diagnosis of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy.

Methods: Patients having undergone Ivor-Lewis procedure between January 2009 and September 2017 were included in this bicentric retrospective study. CRP values were recorded between postoperative day 3 (POD 3) and postoperative day 5 (POD 5). All postoperative complications were recorded, and the primary endpoint was anastomotic leak.

Results: We included 585 patients. Among them, 241 (41.2%) developed infectious complications and 69 patients (11.8%) developed anastomotic leak. CRP had the best predictive value on POD 5 (AUC = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.67-0.81). On POD 5, a cut-off value of 130 mg/L yielded a sensitivity of 87%, a specificity of 51%, and a negative predictive value of 96% for the detection of anastomotic leak.

Conclusions: CRP may help in identifying patients at very low risk of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. Patients with CRP values < 130 mg/L on POD 5 can safely undertake an enhanced recovery protocol.

Keywords: Anastomotic leak; C-reactive protein; Esophageal cancer; Esophagectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Mariette C, Piessen G, Briez N, Gronnier C, Triboulet JP (2011) Oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: which therapeutic approach? Lancet Oncol 12:296–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70125-X - DOI
    1. Lordick F, Mariette C, Haustermans K, Obermannová R, Arnold D (2016) Oesophageal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 27:50–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw329 - DOI
    1. Lledo G, Mariette C, Raoul JL, Dahan L, Landi B, Conroy T, et al. (2016) Cancer de l’oesophage. https://www.snfge.org/content/1-cancer-de-loesophage . Accessed 25 July 2022
    1. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183:630–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(02)00866-8 - DOI
    1. Wilmore DW, Kehlet H (2001) Management of patients in fast track surgery. BMJ 322:473–476. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7284.473 - DOI

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources