Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr;131(4):494-502.
doi: 10.1111/bju.15916. Epub 2022 Oct 26.

The Uniform grading tooL for flexIble ureterorenoscoPes (TULIP-tool): a Delphi consensus project on standardised evaluation of flexible ureterorenoscopes

Affiliations

The Uniform grading tooL for flexIble ureterorenoscoPes (TULIP-tool): a Delphi consensus project on standardised evaluation of flexible ureterorenoscopes

Michaël M E L Henderickx et al. BJU Int. 2023 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To develop a standardised tool to evaluate flexible ureterorenoscopes (fURS).

Materials and methods: A three-stage consensus building approach based on the modified Delphi technique was performed under guidance of a steering group. First, scope- and user-related parameters used to evaluate fURS were identified through a systematic scoping review. Then, the main categories and subcategories were defined, and the expert panel was selected. Finally, a two-step modified Delphi consensus project was conducted to firstly obtain consensus on the relevance and exact definition of each (sub)category necessary to evaluate fURS, and secondly on the evaluation method (setting, used tools and unit of outcome) of those (sub)categories. Consensus was reached at a predefined threshold of 80% high agreement.

Results: The panel consisted of 30 experts in the field of endourology. The first step of the modified Delphi consensus project consisted of two questionnaires with a response rate of 97% (n = 29) for both. Consensus was reached for the relevance and definition of six main categories and 12 subcategories. The second step consisted of three questionnaires (response rate of 90%, 97% and 100%, respectively). Consensus was reached on the method of measurement for all (sub)categories.

Conclusion: This modified Delphi consensus project reached consensus on a standardised grading tool for the evaluation of fURS - The Uniform grading tooL for flexIble ureterorenoscoPes (TULIP) tool. This is a first step in creating uniformity in this field of research to facilitate future comparison of outcomes of the functionality and handling of fURS.

Keywords: #EndoUrology; #UroStone; #Urology; Delphi consensus; endourology; evaluation; flexible ureterorenoscope; quality assessment; tool.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Georgescu DR, Multescu R, Geavlete PA, Geavlete B. Retrograde Ureteroscopy, 1st edn. San Diego, CA: Elsevier, 2016
    1. Dragos LB, Somani BK, Keller EX et al. Characteristics of current digital single-use flexible ureteroscopes versus their reusable counterparts: an in-vitro comparative analysis. Transl Androl Urol 2019; 8: S359-70
    1. Keller EX, De Coninck V, Traxer O. Next-generation fiberoptic and digital ureteroscopes. Urol Clin North Am 2019; 46: 147-63
    1. Zeng G, Traxer O, Zhong W et al. International alliance of urolithiasis guideline on retrograde intrarenal surgery. BJU Int 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15836
    1. Mazzucchi E, Marchini GS, Berto FCG et al. Single-use flexible ureteroscopes: update and perspective in developing countries. A narrative review. Int Braz J Urol 2022; 48: 456-67

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources