Five-day versus 7-day treatment regimen with azacitidine in lower risk myelodysplastic syndrome: A phase 2, multicenter, randomized trial
- PMID: 36208097
- DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34492
Five-day versus 7-day treatment regimen with azacitidine in lower risk myelodysplastic syndrome: A phase 2, multicenter, randomized trial
Abstract
Background: Low-dose azacitidine (AZA) regimens, primarily 5-day AZA, have been used in lower risk myelodysplastic syndrome (LrMDS) but they have yet to be directly compared to the standard 7-day, uninterrupted dosing schedule.
Method: In this phase 2, multicenter, randomized trial, 55 patients with adult LrMDS (low and intermediate-1 risk by international prognostic scoring system [IPSS]) were randomly assigned and received either 5-day (n = 26) or 7-day (n = 29) AZA between March 2012 and August 2020. The trial was stopped prematurely because of the slow accrual of patients. The primary end point was the overall response rate (ORR) of the 5-day AZA as compared to that of the 7-day regimen.
Results: Median patient age was 59 years, and IPSS intermediate-1 risk comprised the majority (81.8%). The median number of cycles in both arms was six. In the ITT subset (n = 53), in each of the 5-day and 7-day arms, the ORR of 48.0% and 39.3%, hematologic improvement of 44.0% and 39.3%, and RBC transfusion independence of 35.3% and 40.0% were observed respectively, and none of these findings were significantly different between the two arms. A cytogenetic response rate was significantly higher in the 7-day arm (8.3% and 53.8%, p = .027). Survival and adverse events were similar between the groups, although gastrointestinal toxicities, grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia, and febrile neutropenia were less frequent in the 5-day arm.
Conclusion: The 5-day AZA in LrMDS showed comparable efficacy to a 7-day regimen in terms of similar overall response and other outcomes, despite significantly higher rates of cytogenetic responses in the 7-day regimen.
Lay summary: Azacitidine (75 mg/m2 /day for 7 consecutive days per 28-day cycle) has shown survival benefit in patients with higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Although the use of azacitidine is less-well studied for lower risk MDS, it is generally accepted as a feasible option for lower risk MDS (LrMDS).
Keywords: 5-day regimen; 7-day standard regimen; azacitidine; dosing schedule; lower risk disease; myelodysplastic syndrome.
© 2022 American Cancer Society.
Similar articles
-
Efficacy and safety of a 5-day regimen of azacitidine for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.Eur J Haematol. 2016 Sep;97(3):228-31. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12709. Epub 2016 Jan 3. Eur J Haematol. 2016. PMID: 26613362
-
Hematologic response to three alternative dosing schedules of azacitidine in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.J Clin Oncol. 2009 Apr 10;27(11):1850-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.1058. Epub 2009 Mar 2. J Clin Oncol. 2009. PMID: 19255328 Clinical Trial.
-
Design and rationale of the QUAZAR Lower-Risk MDS (AZA-MDS-003) trial: a randomized phase 3 study of CC-486 (oral azacitidine) plus best supportive care vs placebo plus best supportive care in patients with IPSS lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes and poor prognosis due to red blood cell transfusion-dependent anemia and thrombocytopenia.BMC Hematol. 2016 May 3;16:12. doi: 10.1186/s12878-016-0049-5. eCollection 2016. BMC Hematol. 2016. PMID: 27148452 Free PMC article.
-
Azacitidine for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome, chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia and acute myeloid leukaemia.Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14 Suppl 1:69-74. doi: 10.3310/hta14Suppl1/10. Health Technol Assess. 2010. PMID: 20507806 Review.
-
FDA drug approval summary: azacitidine (5-azacytidine, Vidaza) for injectable suspension.Oncologist. 2005 Mar;10(3):176-82. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.10-3-176. Oncologist. 2005. PMID: 15793220 Review.
Cited by
-
Infections and antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.Semin Hematol. 2024 Dec;61(6):348-357. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2024.07.004. Epub 2024 Aug 3. Semin Hematol. 2024. PMID: 39198132 Review.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Cazzola M. Myelodysplastic syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(14):1358-1374. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1904794
-
- Greenberg P, Cox C, LeBeau MM, et al. International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 1997;89(6):2079-2088. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v89.6.2079
-
- Greenberg PL, Tuechler H, Schanz J, et al. Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2012;120(12):2454-2465. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-03-420489
-
- Kim YJ, Jang JH, Kwak JY, Lee JH, Kim HJ. Use of azacitidine for myelodysplastic syndromes: controversial issues and practical recommendations. Blood Res. 2013;48(2):87-98. https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2013.48.2.87
-
- Santini V. Treatment of low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2016;2016(1):462-469. https://doi.org/10.1182/asheducation-2016.1.462
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous