Gender-Affirming Facial Feminization Surgery at a Public, Safety-Net Hospital: A Single-Center Early Experience
- PMID: 36210502
- DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009057
Gender-Affirming Facial Feminization Surgery at a Public, Safety-Net Hospital: A Single-Center Early Experience
Abstract
Background: Facial feminization surgery (FFS) remains inaccessible to many transgender patients. Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital (ZSFG) was among the first public, safety-net hospitals to perform FFS. The purpose of this study is to examine the postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent FFS at ZSFG and describe barriers to providing FFS in a public hospital setting.
Methods: A retrospective review identified patients who underwent FFS at ZSFG. Demographic data, comorbidity profiles, postoperative outcomes, and hospital utilization data were collected from the medical records. FACE-Q modules (scored 0-100) were used to survey patient satisfaction at least 1 year postoperatively.
Results: Seventeen patients underwent comprehensive FFS surgery at ZSFG. The median age was 41 years [interquartile range (IQR): 38-55], median body mass index was 26.4 (IQR: 24.1-31.3). Patients underwent a median of 9 procedures, the most common of which included frontal cranioplasty (n=13, 77%), open brow lift (n=13, 77%), rhinoplasty (n=12, 71%), and mandible contouring (n=12, 71%). There were no complications, readmissions, or reoperations within 30 days. Patients reported high satisfaction with the surgical outcome (median: 87, IQR: 87-100), excellent postoperative psychological functioning (median: 100, IQR: 88-100), and low levels of appearance-related distress (median: 3, IQR: 0-35). An estimated 243 operating room hours and 51 inpatient bed days were required to cover all FFS procedures.
Conclusions: Performing FFS in a public, safety-net hospital was associated with zero postoperative complications, few revision procedures, and excellent patient satisfaction. Limited operating room hours and inpatient availability represented barriers to providing FFS in this setting.
Copyright © 2022 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- American Psychiatric Association (APA). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) . American Psychiatric Association Publishing; 2013
-
- Ainsworth TA, Spiegel JH. Quality of life of individuals with and without facial feminization surgery or gender reassignment surgery. Qual Life Res 2010;19:1019–1024
-
- Morrison SD, Chong HJ, Dy GW, et al. Educational exposure to transgender patient care in plastic surgery training. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;138:944–953
-
- Raffaini M, Magri AS, Agostini T. Full facial feminization surgery: patient satisfaction assessment based on 180 procedures involving 33 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;137:438–448
-
- Isung J, Mollermark C, Farnebo F, et al. Craniofacial reconstructive surgery improves appearance congruence in male-to-female transsexual patients. Arch Sex Behav 2017;46:1573–1576
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources