Physician response to informed consent regulations for randomized clinical trials
- PMID: 3621123
- DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19870915)60:6<1415::aid-cncr2820600641>3.0.co;2-2
Physician response to informed consent regulations for randomized clinical trials
Abstract
To improve our understanding of physician reluctance to participate in randomized clinical trials, we examined physician responses to the regulation of obtaining written informed consent. Between June 1984 and February 1985 a purposive sample of 170 breast cancer specialists from eight countries completed a self-administered questionnaire and follow-up interview. The sample included 90 medical oncologists, 65 surgeons, and 29 radiotherapists. Responses to individual questions are presented in three global categories: (1) physician role--physicians believed that their view of their professional "self" was not compatible with informed consent regulations; (2) physician autonomy--physicians perceived a loss of individual decision-making power and an increase in professional accountability; and (3) physician-patient relationship--physicians stated that informed consent regulations influenced what they told trial patients and affected the ensuing doctor-patient relationship. Respondents developed complex methods to accommodate the incongruities they perceived between their view of their professional self and the need to obtain informed consent.
Similar articles
-
Informed consent: the physicians' perspective.Soc Sci Med. 1987;24(2):135-43. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(87)90246-2. Soc Sci Med. 1987. PMID: 3563556
-
Clinical trials and physicians as double agents.Yale J Biol Med. 1992 Mar-Apr;65(2):65-74. Yale J Biol Med. 1992. PMID: 1519378 Free PMC article.
-
[The origin of informed consent].Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005. PMID: 16602332 Italian.
-
Human experimentation. Protecting patient autonomy through informed consent.J Leg Med. 1997 Jun;18(2):221-50. doi: 10.1080/01947649709511033. J Leg Med. 1997. PMID: 9230568 Review. No abstract available.
-
Statutory requirements for disclosure of breast cancer treatment alternatives.J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994 Aug 17;86(16):1202-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/86.16.1202. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994. PMID: 8040887 Review.
Cited by
-
Anaesthetists' and surgeons' attitudes towards informed consent in the UK: an observational study.BMC Med Ethics. 2010 Feb 23;11:2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-11-2. BMC Med Ethics. 2010. PMID: 20178621 Free PMC article.
-
Pediatric nephrologists' beliefs regarding randomized controlled trials.J Investig Med. 2014 Jan;62(1):84-7. doi: 10.2310/JIM.0000000000000019. J Investig Med. 2014. PMID: 24379023 Free PMC article.
-
Physicians' beliefs and behaviour during a randomized controlled trial of episiotomy: consequences for women in their care.CMAJ. 1995 Sep 15;153(6):769-79. CMAJ. 1995. PMID: 7664230 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Physician participation in clinical research and trials: issues and approaches.Adv Med Educ Pract. 2011 Mar 7;2:85-93. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S14103. Print 2011. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2011. PMID: 23745079 Free PMC article.
-
Integrating clinical and research psychiatry.J Psychiatry Neurosci. 1995 Mar;20(2):150-4. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 1995. PMID: 7703224 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical