Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 21:9:943229.
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.943229. eCollection 2022.

The predictive value of CatLet© angiographic scoring system for long-term prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting > 12 h after symptom onset

Affiliations

The predictive value of CatLet© angiographic scoring system for long-term prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting > 12 h after symptom onset

Heng Wang et al. Front Cardiovasc Med. .

Abstract

Background: We have recently developed the C oronary A rtery T ree description and L esion E valua T ion (CatLet©) angiographic scoring system, which is capable of accounting for the variability in coronary anatomy, and risk-stratifying patients with coronary artery disease. This study aimed to clarify whether the CatLet score had a predictive value for long-term prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) presenting > 12 h after symptom onset.

Materials and methods: The CatLet score was calculated for 1,018 consecutively enrolled AMI patients, who were divided into 3 groups according to the CatLet score tertiles. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as a composite of myocardial infarction, cardiac death, and ischemia-driven revascularization; secondary endpoints were all-cause death, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven revascularization.

Results: The CatLet score was capable of predicting long-term prognosis at a median 4.9-year follow-up alone or after adjustment for risk factors. Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (95% CI)/unit higher score were 1.06 (1.05-1.08) for MACEs, 1.05 (1.03-1.07) for all-cause death, 1.06 (1.04-1.09) for cardiac death, 1.06 (1.04-1.08) for myocardial infarction, and 1.06 (1.04-1.08) for revascularization. The univariate model showed good calibration (χ2 = 8.25, P = 0.4091) and good discrimination (area under ROC curve = 0.7086) for MACEs.

Conclusion: The CatLet score is an independent predictor of long-term clinical outcomes of patients with AMI presenting > 12 h after symptom onset (http://www.chictr.org.cn; Registry Number: ChiCTR2000033730).

Keywords: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; acute myocardial infarction; angiographic score; major adverse cardiac events; prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Kaplan–Meier curves for clinical outcomes at 5 years according to the CatLet score tertiles. MACE, major adverse cardiac events.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
The ROC curves of univariate models for clinical outcomes. MACE, major adverse cardiac events; AUC, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve; and CI, confidence interval.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Calibration plots of univariate models for clinical outcomes. A red lowess smoothing curve was added to each calibration plot. Intercept of 0 and slope of 1 indicate perfect prediction. Negative and positive intercepts indicate overestimation and underestimation, respectively. MACE, major adverse cardiac events; HL, Hosmer-Lemeshow test.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Hazard ratios for MACEs per 10 units higher CatLet score stratified by risk factors, categorically or medially. LDL-c, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-c, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; Lp(a), lipoprotein(a); TG, triglycerides; and TC, total cholesterol.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. van Nunen LX, Zimmermann FM, Tonino PA, Barbato E, Baumbach A, Engstrøm T, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME): 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. (2015) 386:1853–60. - PubMed
    1. De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, Barbato E, Tonino PA, Piroth Z, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. (2012) 367:991–1001. - PubMed
    1. Sianos G, Morel MA, Kappetein AP, Morice MC, Colombo A, Dawkins K, et al. The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention. (2005) 1:219–27. - PubMed
    1. He YM, Shen L, Ge JB. Fallacies and possible remedies of the SYNTAX score. J Intervent Cardiol. (2020) 2020:8822308. 10.1155/2020/8822308 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leaman DM, Brower RW, Meester GT, Serruys P, van den Brand M. Coronary artery atherosclerosis: severity of the disease, severity of angina pectoris and compromised left ventricular function. Circulation. (1981) 63:285–99. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources