Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 21:10:972348.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.972348. eCollection 2022.

Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: A YouTube-based quality-control study

Xiang Zhang  1 , Yi Yang  1 , Yi-Wei Shen  1 , Ke-Rui Zhang  1 , Li-Tai Ma  1 , Chen Ding  1 , Bei-Yu Wang  1 , Yang Meng  1 , Hao Liu  1
Affiliations

Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: A YouTube-based quality-control study

Xiang Zhang et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: More than 70 percent of the world's population is tortured with neck pain more than once in their vast life, of which 50-85% recur within 1-5 years of the initial episode. With medical resources affected by the epidemic, more and more people seek health-related knowledge via YouTube. This article aims to assess the quality and reliability of the medical information shared on YouTube regarding neck pain.

Methods: We searched on YouTube using the keyword "neck pain" to include the top 50 videos by relevance, then divided them into five and seven categories based on their content and source. Each video was quantitatively assessed using the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA), DISCERN, Global Quality Score (GQS), Neck Pain-Specific Score (NPSS), and video power index (VPI). Spearman correlation analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between JAMA, GQS, DISCERN, NPSS and VPI. A multiple linear regression analysis was applied to identify video features affecting JAMA, GQS, DISCERN, and NPSS.

Results: The videos had a mean JAMA score of 2.56 (SD = 0.43), DISCERN of 2.55 (SD = 0.44), GQS of 2.86 (SD = 0.72), and NPSS of 2.90 (SD = 2.23). Classification by video upload source, non-physician videos had the greatest share at 38%, and sorted by video content, exercise training comprised 40% of the videos. Significant differences between the uploading sources were observed for VPI (P = 0.012), JAMA (P < 0.001), DISCERN (P < 0.001), GQS (P = 0.001), and NPSS (P = 0.007). Spearman correlation analysis showed that JAMA, DISCERN, GQS, and NPSS significantly correlated with each other (JAMA vs. DISCERN, p < 0.001, JAMA vs. GQS, p < 0.001, JAMA vs. NPSS, p < 0.001, DISCERN vs. GQS, p < 0.001, DISCERN vs. NPSS, p < 0.001, GQS vs. NPSS, p < 0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis suggested that a higher JAMA score, DISCERN, or GQS score were closely related to a higher probability of an academic, physician, non-physician or medical upload source (P < 0.005), and a higher NPSS score was associated with a higher probability of an academic source (P = 0.001) than of an individual upload source.

Conclusions: YouTube videos pertaining to neck pain contain low quality, low reliability, and incomplete information. Patients may be put at risk for health complications due to inaccurate, and incomplete information, particularly during the COVID-19 crisis. Academic groups should be committed to high-quality video production and promotion to YouTube users.

Keywords: YouTube; content analysis; education; neck pain; quality-control study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The video title, views per day, VPI, JAMA score, DISCERN, and GQS of the 50 videos are listed.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Categorical distribution of the videos based on source.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Categorical distribution of the videos based on content.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Damasceno GM, Ferreira AS, Nogueira LAC, Reis FJJ, Andrade ICS, Meziat-Filho N. Text neck and neck pain in 18–21-year-old young adults. Eur Spine J. (2018) 27:1249–54. 10.1007/s00586-017-5444-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoy DG, Protani M, De R, Buchbinder R. The epidemiology of neck pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. (2010) 24:783–92. 10.1016/j.berh.2011.01.019 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hurwitz EL, Randhawa K, Yu H, Côté P, Haldeman S. The Global Spine Care Initiative: a summary of the global burden of low back and neck pain studies. Eur Spine J. (2018) 27(Suppl. 6):796–801. 10.1007/s00586-017-5432-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Peng B, DePalma MJ. Cervical disc degeneration and neck pain. J Pain Res. (2018) 11:2853–7. 10.2147/JPR.S180018 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Popescu A, Lee H. Neck pain and lower back pain. Med Clin North Am. (2020) 104:279–92. 10.1016/j.mcna.2019.11.003 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types