Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Sep 23:12:980239.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.980239. eCollection 2022.

Photodynamic therapy for prostate cancer: Recent advances, challenges and opportunities

Affiliations
Review

Photodynamic therapy for prostate cancer: Recent advances, challenges and opportunities

Qin Xue et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Over the past two decades, there has been a tendency toward early diagnosis of prostate cancer due to raised awareness among the general public and professionals, as well as the promotion of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening. As a result, patients with prostate cancer are detected at an earlier stage. Due to the risks of urine incontinence, erectile dysfunction, etc., surgery is not advised because the tumor is so small at this early stage. Doctors typically only advise active surveillance. However, it will bring negative psychological effects on patients, such as anxiety. And there is a higher chance of cancer progression. Focal therapy has received increasing attention as an alternative option between active monitoring and radical therapy. Due to its minimally invasive, oncological safety, low toxicity, minimal effects on functional outcomes and support by level 1 evidence from the only RCT within the focal therapy literature, photodynamic treatment (PDT) holds significant promise as the focal therapy of choice over other modalities for men with localized prostate cancer. However, there are still numerous obstacles that prevent further advancement. The review that follows provides an overview of the preclinical and clinical published research on PDT for prostate cancer from 1999 to the present. It focuses on clinical applications of PDT and innovative techniques and technologies that address current problems, especially the use of nanoparticle photosensitizers in PDT of prostate cancer.

Keywords: clinical studies; nanoparticle photosensitizers; photodynamic therapy; photosensitizer; prostate cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A generalized diagram depicting PDT for prostate cancer. PS was administered intravenously to patients at various times before LED excitation (depending on the type and dose of PS). The optical fibers are placed within plastic catheter needles that are positioned and guided by transrectal ultrasound and a brachytherapy-type template to the prostate gland via the perineum.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mechanisms of PDT on tumors. Upon light activation, the 1PS is converted from a ground state (S0) to the excited singlet state (S1) as 1PS. 1PS is excited to the triplet state (T1) as 3PS via intersystem crossing. Further, 3PS promotes the generation of ROS through two mechanisms: type I reactions involve the formation of ROS, such as peroxides (H2O2, ROOH), superoxide anion(O2-•), hydroxyl radical (HO) and hydroxyl radicals (HOO). Type II, the energy from 3PS is directly transferred to triplet state oxygen (3O2) to form singlet oxygen (1O2). Ultimately leading to cellular toxicity, recruitment and activation of immune cells and vascular damage.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Islami F, Ward EM, Sung H, Cronin KA, Tangka FKL, Sherman RL, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, part 1: National cancer statistics. JNCI: J Natl Cancer Inst (2021) 113:1648–69. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab131 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Mathers C, Parkin DM, Piñeros M, et al. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer (2019) 144:1941–53. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31937 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA A Cancer J Clin (2020) 70:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mouraviev V, Mayes JM, Polascik TJ. Pathologic basis of focal therapy for early-stage prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol (2009) 6:205–15. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2009.29 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Tammela TLJ, Zappa M, Nelen V, et al. Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European randomised study of screening for prostate cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up. Lancet (2014) 384:2027–35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60525-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed