Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep;74(3):434-438.
doi: 10.1007/s12070-021-02529-5. Epub 2021 Apr 1.

Pragmatic Skills in Children with Hearing Loss: Comparison Between Cochlear Implants and Hearing Aids Users

Mohammad Rezaei  1 , Vahid Rashedi  2 , Vahidreza Borhaninejad  3 , Zohreh Sadat Nurian  4
Affiliations

Pragmatic Skills in Children with Hearing Loss: Comparison Between Cochlear Implants and Hearing Aids Users

Mohammad Rezaei et al. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Pragmatic language ability denotes the ability to use language in a social context. There is a lack of research that has compared children's pragmatic skills with hearing loss with those of hearing peers. This study questioned whether children with a cochlear implant would show better pragmatic skills than children with hearing aids. 52 children were included in three groups: cochlear implant (n = 16), hearing aid (n = 16), and normal hearing (n = 20). The participants' pragmatic skills were evaluated using the Persian version of the children's communication checklist. Of the 52 participants recruited, 22 (42.3%) were males, and 30 (57.7%) were females. The mean age of the CI, HA, and NH group participants was 75.19 ± 10.80, 72.19 ± 8.68, and 68.90 ± 6.78 months, respectively (P > 0.05). There was a significant difference between the mean scores of Speech Output and Syntax between the groups (CI, HA and NH) (P < 0.001). The hearing-impaired children show acceptable pragmatic skills in comparison with NH children. Specialists, such as teachers and clinicians, should be alert of the abilities and difficulties that the hearing-impaired children might be facing in the regular classroom.

Keywords: Cochlear implant; Hearing aids; Pragmatic skills.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThere is no conflict of interest to be declared.

References

    1. Ibertsson T, Hansson K, Asker-Àrnason L, Sahlén B. Speech recognition, working memory and conversation in children with cochlear implants. Deaf EducInt. 2009;11(3):132–151. doi: 10.1179/146431509790559615. - DOI
    1. Caselli MC, Rinaldi P, Varuzza C, Giuliani A, Burdo S. Cochlear implant in the second year of life: Lexical and grammatical outcomes. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012;55:382–394. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0248). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Paatsch LE, Toe DM. A comparison of pragmatic abilities of children who are deaf or hard of hearing and their hearing peers. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2014;19(1):1–19. doi: 10.1093/deafed/ent030. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen HV (2014) Pragmatic skills intervention: understanding pragmatic differences, communication breakdown management, peer & self attitudes and perceptions in children with hearing loss
    1. Archbold S, Harris M, O’Donoghue G, Nikolopoulos T, White A, Richmond HL. Reading abilities after cochlear implantation: the effect of age at implantation on outcomes at 5 and 7 years after implantation. Int J PediatrOtorhinolaryngol. 2008;72(10):1471–1478. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.06.016. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources