Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar-Apr;29(2):202-209.
doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001654. Epub 2022 Oct 9.

Public Health Learning Agenda for Systems Change Toolkit: National Pilot Evaluation Results

Christina Welter  1 , Sarah Davis, Jill Elnicki, Phoebe K G Kulik, Laura M Lloyd, Martha Tenney, Karla Todd Barrett, Barbara Rose, Cassidy Walter
Affiliations

Public Health Learning Agenda for Systems Change Toolkit: National Pilot Evaluation Results

Christina Welter et al. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2023 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Context: There have been multiple calls in the United States for public health workforce development approaches that expand practitioner skill sets to respond to profound inequities and improve population health more effectively. However, most workforce models address individual competencies that instead focus on collective approaches to systems change.

Program: In response to this opportunity, the HRSA-funded Regional Public Health Training Centers (PHTCs) and the University of Illinois Chicago Policy, Practice, and Prevention Research Center (P3RC) released Creating a Learning Agenda for Systems Change: A Toolkit for Building an Adaptive Public Health Workforce (the Toolkit) in December 2020. We later supplemented the Toolkit with additional learning activities to launch the Learning Agenda Toolkit Pilot Test (Toolkit Pilot).

Implementation: From June to August 2021, 24 diverse teams piloted the Toolkit. Teams completed a multistep process simulating the development of a learning agenda aimed at addressing community health issues and impacting systems change.

Evaluation: We conducted an evaluation process to assess the usability and impact of the Toolkit Pilot to inform its improvement and future implementation. An evaluation subcommittee analyzed worksheets completed by the Pilot Teams that are aligned to the Learning Agenda steps and conducted and analyzed 12 key informant interviews using concepts from the Toolkit Pilot Logic Model.

Findings and discussion: Evaluation results suggest that most Pilot Teams found that the Toolkit Pilot offered a step-by-step process toward a clear vision that produced a concrete product on how to address community challenges through learning and systems change. Pilot Teams noted that the Toolkit Pilot provided exposure to and a unique focus on systems thinking; however, prior knowledge of systems thinking and systems change was important. Building readiness for systems change and having more time, resources, and technical assistance would be needed for future versions of the Learning Agenda Toolkit.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Erwin PC, Brownson RC. The public health practitioner of the future. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(8):1227–1232.
    1. Bogaert K, Castrucci BC, Gould E, Rider N, Whang C, Corcoran E. Top training needs of the governmental public health workforce. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2019;25(2)(suppl):S134–S144.
    1. de Beaumont Foundation. Adapting and aligning public health strategic skills. https://debeaumont.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Adapting-and-Aligning-... . Published March 2021. Accessed May 5, 2021.
    1. Gebbie KM, Turnock BJ. The public health workforce, 2006: new challenges. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006;25(4):923–933.
    1. Gebbie K, Merrill J, Tilson HH. The public health workforce. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002;21(6):57–67.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources