Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Sedation in Critically Ill Patients and Dose-associated 90-Day Mortality: A Secondary Cohort Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial (SPICE III)
- PMID: 36215171
- DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202206-1208OC
Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Sedation in Critically Ill Patients and Dose-associated 90-Day Mortality: A Secondary Cohort Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial (SPICE III)
Abstract
Rationale: The SPICE III (Sedation Practice in Intensive Care Evaluation) trial reported significant heterogeneity in mortality with dexmedetomidine treatment. Supplemental propofol was commonly used to achieve desirable sedation. Objectives: To quantify the association of different infusion rates of dexmedetomidine and propofol, given in combination, with mortality and to determine if this is modified by age. Methods: We included 1,177 patients randomized in SPICE III to receive dexmedetomidine and given supplemental propofol, stratified by age (>65 or ⩽65 yr). We used double stratification analysis to produce quartiles of steady infusion rates of dexmedetomidine while escalating propofol dose and vice versa. We used Cox proportional hazard and multivariable regression adjusted for relevant clinical variable to evaluate the association of sedative dose with 90-day mortality. Measurements and Main Results: Younger patients (598 of 1,177 [50.8%]) received significantly higher doses of both sedatives compared with older patients to achieve comparable sedation depth. On double stratification analysis, escalating infusion rates of propofol to 1.27 mg/kg/h at a steady dexmedetomidine infusion rate (0.54 μg/kg/h) was associated with reduced adjusted mortality in younger but not older patients. This was consistent with multivariable regression modeling (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.78; P < 0.0001) adjusted for baseline risk and interaction with dexmedetomidine dose. In contrast, among younger patients, using multivariable regression, escalating dexmedetomidine infusion rate was associated with increased adjusted mortality (hazard ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.65; P = 0.029). Conclusions: In patients ⩽65 years of age sedated with dexmedetomidine and propofol combination, preferentially increasing the dose of propofol was associated with decreased adjusted 90-day mortality. Conversely, increasing dexmedetomidine may be associated with increased mortality. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01728558).
Keywords: age groups; intensive care; mechanical ventilation; respiratory; sedative effect.
Comment in
-
Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Sedation in Critically Ill Patients: How Much Is Too Much?Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Apr 1;207(7):806-807. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202210-1931ED. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023. PMID: 36520988 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Early Sedation with Dexmedetomidine in Critically Ill Patients.N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 27;380(26):2506-2517. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1904710. Epub 2019 May 19. N Engl J Med. 2019. PMID: 31112380 Clinical Trial.
-
The effect of dexmedetomidine on vasopressor requirements in patients with septic shock: a subgroup analysis of the Sedation Practice in Intensive Care Evaluation [SPICE III] Trial.Crit Care. 2020 Jul 16;24(1):441. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03115-x. Crit Care. 2020. PMID: 32678054 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam or propofol for sedation during prolonged mechanical ventilation: two randomized controlled trials.JAMA. 2012 Mar 21;307(11):1151-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.304. JAMA. 2012. PMID: 22436955 Clinical Trial.
-
Dexmedetomidine versus propofol sedation in reducing delirium among older adults in the ICU: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020 Feb;37(2):121-131. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001131. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020. PMID: 31860605
-
Effectiveness of dexmedetomidine versus propofol on extubation times, length of stay and mortality rates in adult cardiac surgery patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2018 May;16(5):1220-1239. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003488. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2018. PMID: 29762314
Cited by
-
[Sedation of critically ill patients with dexmedetomidine].Anaesthesiologie. 2023 Mar;72(3):209-211. doi: 10.1007/s00101-022-01244-2. Epub 2023 Jan 4. Anaesthesiologie. 2023. PMID: 36598530 German. No abstract available.
-
Risk factors for in-hospital mortality in surgical patients with abdominal sepsis in China: a nested case-control study.BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 25;15(4):e092310. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092310. BMJ Open. 2025. PMID: 40280608 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-Effectiveness of α2 Agonists for Intravenous Sedation in Patients With Critical Illness.JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e2517533. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.17533. JAMA Netw Open. 2025. PMID: 40388914 Free PMC article.
-
Propofol and Dexmedetomidine Ameliorate Endotoxemia-Associated Encephalopathy via Inhibiting Ferroptosis.Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024 Apr 23;18:1349-1368. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S458013. eCollection 2024. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024. PMID: 38681208 Free PMC article.
-
Sedation for Patients with Sepsis: Towards a Personalised Approach.J Pers Med. 2023 Nov 24;13(12):1641. doi: 10.3390/jpm13121641. J Pers Med. 2023. PMID: 38138868 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical