PET Imaging of Fibroblast Activation Protein in Various Types of Cancer Using 68Ga-FAP-2286: Comparison with 18F-FDG and 68Ga-FAPI-46 in a Single-Center, Prospective Study
- PMID: 36215571
- PMCID: PMC10071807
- DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264544
PET Imaging of Fibroblast Activation Protein in Various Types of Cancer Using 68Ga-FAP-2286: Comparison with 18F-FDG and 68Ga-FAPI-46 in a Single-Center, Prospective Study
Abstract
PET imaging that targets fibroblast activation protein (FAP) on the surface of cancer-associated fibroblasts has yielded promising tumor diagnostic results. FAP-2286 contains cyclic peptides as FAP-binding motifs to optimize tumor retention compared with the small-molecule FAP inhibitor (FAPI) series (FAPI-04/46). The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-FAP-2286 to detect primary and metastatic lesions in patients with various types of cancer, compared with 18F-FDG and 68Ga-FAP-2286. Methods: Sixty-four patients with 15 types of cancer underwent 68Ga-FAP-2286 PET/CT for initial assessment or detection of recurrence. For comparison, 63 patients underwent paired 68Ga-FAP-2286 and 18F-FDG PET/CT and 19 patients underwent paired 68Ga-FAP-2286 and 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT. Lesion uptake was quantified as SUVmax and tumor-to-background ratio. The Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test was used to compare SUVmax between PET modalities, and the McNemar test was used to compare lesion detectability. Results: Uptake of 68Ga-FAP-2286 was significantly higher than that of 18F-FDG in primary tumors (median SUVmax, 11.1 vs. 6.9; P < 0.001), lymph node metastases (median SUVmax, 10.6 vs. 6.2; P < 0.001), and distant metastases, resulting in improved image contrast and lesion detectability. All primary tumors (46/46) were clearly visualized by 68Ga-FAP-2286 PET/CT, whereas 9 of the 46 lesions could not be visualized by 18F-FDG PET/CT. The lesion detection rate of 68Ga-FAP-2286 PET/CT was superior to that of 18F-FDG PET/CT for involved lymph nodes (98% [105/107] vs. 85% [91/107], P = 0.001) and bone and visceral metastases (95% [162/171] vs. 67% [114/171], P < 0.001). 68Ga-FAP-2286 yielded tumor uptake and lesion detection rates similar to those of 68Ga-FAPI-46 in a subcohort of 19 patients. Conclusion: 68Ga-FAP-2286 is a promising FAP-inhibitor derivative for safe cancer diagnosis, staging, and restaging. It may be a better alternative to 18F-FDG for the cancer types that exhibit low-to-moderate uptake of 18F-FDG, which include gastric, pancreatic, and hepatic cancers. In addition, 68Ga-FAP-2286 and 68Ga-FAPI-46 yielded comparable clinical results.
Keywords: FAP-2286; FAPI-46; PET/CT; fibroblast activation protein.
© 2023 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
Figures







Similar articles
-
Fibroblast Activation Protein-Targeted PET/CT with 18F-Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor-74 for Evaluation of Gastrointestinal Cancer: Comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT.J Nucl Med. 2024 Jan 2;65(1):40-51. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266329. J Nucl Med. 2024. PMID: 37884330
-
The potential utility of [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 as a novel broad-spectrum oncological and non-oncological imaging agent-comparison with [18F]FDG.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022 Feb;49(3):963-979. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05522-w. Epub 2021 Aug 19. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022. PMID: 34410435
-
Superior Tumor Detection for 68Ga-FAPI-46 Versus 18F-FDG PET/CT and Conventional CT in Patients with Cholangiocarcinoma.J Nucl Med. 2023 Jul;64(7):1049-1055. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.122.265215. Epub 2023 Apr 6. J Nucl Med. 2023. PMID: 37024301 Free PMC article.
-
Fibroblast-Activation Protein PET and Histopathology in a Single-Center Database of 324 Patients and 21 Tumor Entities.J Nucl Med. 2023 May;64(5):711-716. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264689. Epub 2022 Dec 29. J Nucl Med. 2023. PMID: 36581374 Review.
-
Evaluation of FAPI PET imaging in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Theranostics. 2023 Aug 21;13(13):4694-4710. doi: 10.7150/thno.88335. eCollection 2023. Theranostics. 2023. PMID: 37649615 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Diagnostic Performance of Radiolabelled FAPI Versus [18F]FDG PET Imaging in Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Oncology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Feb 25;26(5):1978. doi: 10.3390/ijms26051978. Int J Mol Sci. 2025. PMID: 40076605 Free PMC article.
-
Heterogeneity of primary and metastatic CAFs: From differential treatment outcomes to treatment opportunities (Review).Int J Oncol. 2024 May;64(5):54. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2024.5642. Epub 2024 Apr 5. Int J Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38577950 Free PMC article.
-
Preclinical evaluation of [13xLa]La-FAP-2286 as a novel theranostic agent for tumors expressing fibroblast activation protein.Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 3;15(1):7475. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91716-3. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40032959 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of 18F-FAPI-42-RGD as a novel dual-targeting PET tracer in gastric cancer xenograft models.Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025 Apr 15;15(2):44-54. doi: 10.62347/GTZZ9726. eCollection 2025. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025. PMID: 40401111 Free PMC article.
-
SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP) PET.J Nucl Med. 2025 Jan 3;66(1):26-33. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.124.269002. J Nucl Med. 2025. PMID: 39572227 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Pang Y, Zhao L, Luo Z, et al. . Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI and 18F-FDG uptake in gastric, duodenal, and colorectal cancers. Radiology. 2021;298:393–402. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous