What do we know about consensual non-monogamy?
- PMID: 36215906
- DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101468
What do we know about consensual non-monogamy?
Abstract
Recent years have seen considerable interest in consensual non-monogamy from both public and academic perspectives. At least 5% of the North American population is currently in a consensually non-monogamous relationship of some form and there is little difference in measures of relationship quality compared to monogamous relationships. Despite increasing levels of understanding and engagement many practitioners of consensual non-monogamy still experience stigma (and minority stress) which is exacerbated by context (e.g. parenting, healthcare settings), type of consensual non-monogamy (e.g. polyamory vs swinging) and intersects with other identities (e.g. race, sexuality). This review outlines what is currently understood about consensual non-monogamy and argues that relationship diversity has a place alongside gender and sexuality when studying sexual behaviours, romantic relationships, and well-being.
Keywords: Consensual non-monogamy; Healthcare; Romantic relationships; Sexual behaviour; Stigma.
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest statement Nothing declared.
Similar articles
-
Internalized Consensual Non-Monogamy Negativity and Relationship Quality Among People Engaged in Polyamory, Swinging, and Open Relationships.Arch Sex Behav. 2021 May;50(4):1389-1400. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01885-7. Epub 2021 Jun 7. Arch Sex Behav. 2021. PMID: 34100145
-
Stigma Toward Consensual Non-Monogamy: Thematic Analysis and Minority Stress.Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Apr;50(4):571-586. doi: 10.1177/01461672221139086. Epub 2022 Dec 3. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024. PMID: 36461779
-
Jealousy, Consent, and Compersion Within Monogamous and Consensually Non-Monogamous Romantic Relationships.Arch Sex Behav. 2019 Aug;48(6):1811-1828. doi: 10.1007/s10508-018-1286-4. Epub 2019 Jan 3. Arch Sex Behav. 2019. PMID: 30607710
-
Queer Intimacies: A New Paradigm for the Study of Relationship Diversity.J Sex Res. 2019 May-Jun;56(4-5):556-592. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2018.1531281. Epub 2018 Oct 26. J Sex Res. 2019. PMID: 30362833 Review.
-
A critical examination of popular assumptions about the benefits and outcomes of monogamous relationships.Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2013 May;17(2):124-41. doi: 10.1177/1088868312467087. Epub 2012 Nov 21. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2013. PMID: 23175520 Review.
Cited by
-
Exploring Aromanticism Through an Online Qualitative Investigation With the Aromantic Community: "Freeing, Alienating, and Utterly Fantastic".Int J Sex Health. 2024 Feb 14;36(1):126-143. doi: 10.1080/19317611.2024.2311158. eCollection 2024. Int J Sex Health. 2024. PMID: 38596810 Free PMC article.
-
A Qualitative Exploration of the Experiences of Disclosing Non-Monogamy.Arch Sex Behav. 2025 Apr;54(4):1481-1495. doi: 10.1007/s10508-025-03119-0. Epub 2025 Mar 24. Arch Sex Behav. 2025. PMID: 40128496 Free PMC article.
-
Romantic relationship configurations and their correlates among LGBTQ+ persons: A latent class analysis.PLoS One. 2024 Sep 13;19(9):e0309954. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309954. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39269934 Free PMC article.
-
A Narrative Review of the Dichotomy Between the Social Views of Non-Monogamy and the Experiences of Consensual Non-Monogamous People.Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Mar;53(3):931-940. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02786-1. Epub 2024 Jan 4. Arch Sex Behav. 2024. PMID: 38177608 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources