Similar articles

• A prospective randomized trial of three different sizes of core-cutting needle for renal transplant biopsy.

  Nicholson ML, Wheatley TJ, Doughman TM, White SA, Morgan JD, Veitch PS, Furness PN. Nicholson ML, et al. Kidney Int. 2000 Jul;58(1):390-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00177.x. Kidney Int. 2000. PMID: 10886586 Clinical Trial.
• Endoscopic needle biopsy: a comparative study of forceps biopsy, two different types of needles, and salvage cytology in gastrointestinal cancer.

  Graham DY, Tabibian N, Michaletz PA, Kinner BM, Schwartz JT, Heiser MC, Dixon WB, Smith JL. Graham DY, et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 1989 May-Jun;35(3):207-9. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(89)72759-0. Gastrointest Endosc. 1989. PMID: 2759398 Clinical Trial.
• Comparison of fully automated and semi-automated biopsy needles for lung biopsy under CT fluoroscopic guidance.

  Yoshimatsu R, Yamagami T, Tanaka O, Miura H, Tanaka T, Suzuki T, Nishimura T. Yoshimatsu R, et al. Br J Radiol. 2012 Mar;85(1011):208-13. doi: 10.1259/bjr/15132704. Epub 2011 Aug 9. Br J Radiol. 2012. PMID: 21828150 Free PMC article.
• Biopsy needle characteristics.

  Gazelle GS, Haaga JR. Gazelle GS, et al. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1991 Jan-Feb;14(1):13-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02635525. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1991. PMID: 2044121 Review.
• Comparison of the accuracy of US-guided biopsy of breast masses performed with 14-gauge, 16-gauge and 18-gauge automated cutting needle biopsy devices, and review of the literature.

  Huang ML, Hess K, Candelaria RP, Eghtedari M, Adrada BE, Sneige N, Fornage BD. Huang ML, et al. Eur Radiol. 2017 Jul;27(7):2928-2933. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4651-5. Epub 2016 Nov 14. Eur Radiol. 2017. PMID: 27844099 Review.