Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2023 Mar 1;115(3):629-644.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.09.083. Epub 2022 Oct 8.

Optimizing Preventive Adjuvant Linac-Based (OPAL) Radiation: A Phase 2 Trial of Daily Partial Breast Irradiation

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Optimizing Preventive Adjuvant Linac-Based (OPAL) Radiation: A Phase 2 Trial of Daily Partial Breast Irradiation

Jay P Reddy et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Purpose: Evidence supports use of partial-breast irradiation (PBI) in the management of early breast cancer, but the optimal dose-fractionation remains unsettled.

Methods and materials: We conducted a phase 2 clinical trial (OPAL trial) to evaluate a novel PBI dosing schedule of 35 Gy in 10 daily fractions. Patients with close (<2 mm) margins also received a boost of 9 Gy in 3 fractions. Eligible patients underwent margin-negative lumpectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ or estrogen receptor-positive invasive breast cancer, up to 3 cm, pTis-T2 N0. The primary outcome was any grade ≥2 toxic effect occurring from the start of radiation through 6 months of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported cosmesis, breast pain, and functional status, measured using the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcomes Scale, and physician-reported cosmesis, measured using the Radiation Therapy and Oncology Group scale. The Cochran-Armitage trend test and multivariable mixed-effects longitudinal growth curve models compared outcomes for the OPAL study population with those for a control group of similar patients treated with whole-breast irradiation (WBI) plus boost.

Results: All 149 patients enrolled on the OPAL trial received the prescribed dose, and 17.4% received boost. The median age was 64 years; 83.2% were White, and 73.8% were overweight or obese. With median follow-up of 2.0 years, 1 patient (0.7%) experienced in-breast recurrence. Prevalence of the primary toxicity outcome was 17.4% (26 of 149 patients) in the OPAL trial compared with 72.7% (128 of 176 patients) in the control WBI-plus-boost cohort (P < .001). In longitudinal multivariable analysis, treatment on the OPAL trial was associated with improved patient-reported cosmesis (P < .001), functional status (P = .004), breast pain (P = .004), and physician-reported cosmesis (P < .001).

Conclusions: Treatment with daily PBI was associated with substantial reduction in early toxicity and improved patient- and physician-reported outcomes compared with WBI plus boost. Daily external-beam partial-breast irradiation with 13 or fewer fractions merits further prospective evaluation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03077841.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Longitudinal patient-reported outcomes and physician-reported cosmesis comparing patients treated on the OPAL trial to similar patients treated with whole-breast irradiation plus boost on a prior clinical trial. (A-C) Patient-reported cosmetic outcome, functional status, and breast pain, respectively, assessed using the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcomes Scale, with a score of 1 indicating no difference between the treated breast and the contralateral breast that served as an internal control, a score of 2 indicating a small difference, 3 indicating a moderate difference, and 4 indicating a large difference. (D) Cosmetic outcome rated by the treating physician, with a score of 1 indicating excellent outcome, 2 indicating good outcome, 3 indicating fair outcome, and 4 indicating poor outcome, using the Radiation Therapy and Oncology Group scale. *P < .05 for comparison of outcomes in OPAL patients compared with the whole-breast irradiation plus boost control cohort for each time point indicated, using the Student t test. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. Abbreviation: OPAL = Optimizing Preventive Adjuvant Linac-Based Radiation.

References

    1. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative GroupDarby S, McGale P, Correa C, et al. Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: Meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials. Lancet 2011;378:1707–1716. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shaitelman SF, Schlembach PJ, Arzu I, et al. Acute and short-term toxic effects of conventionally fractionated vs hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2015;1:931–941. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shaitelman SF, Lei X, Thompson A, et al. Three-year outcomes with hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated whole-breast irradiation: Results of a randomized, noninferiority clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 2018;36 JCO1800317. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Whelan TJ, Julian JA, Berrang TS, et al. External beam accelerated partial breast irradiation versus whole breast irradiation after breast conserving surgery in women with ductal carcinoma in situ and node-negative breast cancer (RAPID): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2019;394:2165–2172. - PubMed
    1. Vicini FA, Cecchini RS, White JR, et al. Long-term primary results of accelerated partial breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer: A randomised, phase 3, equivalence trial. Lancet 2019;394:2155–2164. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data