The number and level of first-contact emergency medical services crew and clinical outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with dual dispatch response
- PMID: 36216399
- PMCID: PMC9834837
- DOI: 10.15441/ceem.22.205
The number and level of first-contact emergency medical services crew and clinical outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with dual dispatch response
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the association between the number and level of emergency medical technicians (EMTs) in the first-contact emergency medical services (EMS) unit and the clinical outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with a dual dispatch response.
Methods: Adult nontraumatic EMS-treated OHCAs between 2015 and 2018 in a nationwide database, were enrolled. The main exposure was the number and certification level of first-contact EMS crew: three versus two members, proportion of EMT intermediate level (EMT-I) over 50% versus under or equal to 50%. Good neurologic recovery was selected as the primary outcome. Multilevel multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to calculate adjusted odds ratios and confidence intervals.
Results: A total of 26,867 patients were enrolled and analyzed. Good neurologic recovery was different across the study groups: 5.4% in the two-member crews, 7.2% in the three-member crews, 5.9% in the low EMT-I proportion crews, and 6.8% in the high EMT-I proportion crews. In the main analysis, statistically significant differences for favorable outcomes were found between the three-member and two-member crews, and the high EMT-I proportion and low EMT-I proportion crews; for good neurologic recovery, adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) were 1.23 (1.06-1.43) for three-member crews, and 1.28 (1.17-1.40) for a high EMT-I proportion.
Conclusion: The higher number and level of first-contact EMS crew was associated with better neurologic recovery in adult nontraumatic OHCA with a dual-dispatched EMS response.
Keywords: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Emergency medical services; Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures
References
-
- Al-Khatib SM, Stevenson WG, Ackerman MJ, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15:e73–189. - PubMed
-
- Myat A, Song KJ, Rea T. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: current concepts. Lancet. 2018;391:970–9. - PubMed
-
- Berdowski J, Berg RA, Tijssen JG, Koster RW. Global incidences of out-of- hospital cardiac arrest and survival rates: systematic review of 67 prospective studies. Resuscitation. 2010;81:1479–87. - PubMed
-
- Grasner JT, Bossaert L. Epidemiology and management of cardiac arrest: what registries are revealing. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2013;27:293–306. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
