Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec;41(12):1839-1849.
doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.08.013. Epub 2022 Aug 31.

Contemporary trends in PGD incidence, outcomes, and therapies

Affiliations

Contemporary trends in PGD incidence, outcomes, and therapies

Edward Cantu et al. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Background: We sought to describe trends in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use, and define the impact on PGD incidence and early mortality in lung transplantation.

Methods: Patients were enrolled from August 2011 to June 2018 at 10 transplant centers in the multi-center Lung Transplant Outcomes Group prospective cohort study. PGD was defined as Grade 3 at 48 or 72 hours, based on the 2016 PGD ISHLT guidelines. Logistic regression and survival models were used to contrast between group effects for event (i.e., PGD and Death) and time-to-event (i.e., death, extubation, discharge) outcomes respectively. Both modeling frameworks accommodate the inclusion of potential confounders.

Results: A total of 1,528 subjects were enrolled with a 25.7% incidence of PGD. Annual PGD incidence (14.3%-38.2%, p = .0002), median LAS (38.0-47.7 p = .009) and the use of ECMO salvage for PGD (5.7%-20.9%, p = .007) increased over the course of the study. PGD was associated with increased 1 year mortality (OR 1.7 [95% C.I. 1.2, 2.3], p = .0001). Bridging strategies were not associated with increased mortality compared to non-bridged patients (p = .66); however, salvage ECMO for PGD was significantly associated with increased mortality (OR 1.9 [1.3, 2.7], p = .0007). Restricted mean survival time comparison at 1-year demonstrated 84.1 days lost in venoarterial salvaged recipients with PGD when compared to those without PGD (ratio 1.3 [1.1, 1.5]) and 27.2 days for venovenous with PGD (ratio 1.1 [1.0, 1.4]).

Conclusions: PGD incidence continues to rise in modern transplant practice paralleled by significant increases in recipient severity of illness. Bridging strategies have increased but did not affect PGD incidence or mortality. PGD remains highly associated with mortality and is increasingly treated with salvage ECMO.

Keywords: ECMO; bridge to transplant; lung transplantation; outcomes and lung allocation score; primary graft dysfunction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Recipient LAS, PGD incidence and ECMO bridging and salvage strategies over time
Note: 2018 data only includes transplants performed before July. The single case in 2011 was moved to 2012.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Effects of PGD on length of mechanical ventilation over time
Yellow bar signifies 21 days after lung transplant when a majority of US transplant recipients have been discharged from the hospital.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Association of salvage ECMO strategy with mortality
Restricted mean survival time analysis of salvage by ECMO type. Stratification was not performed because transplant type (single versus bilateral) was not associated with mortality (p=0.20). Solid line (Blue) represents no salvage, dashed line (Red) VV ECMO salvage, and dotted line (Green) VA ECMO salvage, respectively. Yellow bars set at 1 year (365 days) and 3 years (1095 days) after transplant.

References

    1. Drolen C, Cantu E, Goldberg HJ, Diamond JM, Courtwright A. Impact of the elimination of the donation service area on United States lung transplant practices and outcomes at high and low competition centers. Am J Transplant 2020;20(12):3631–3638. DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16098. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lehman RR, Chan KM. Elimination of the donor service area (DSA) from lung allocation: No turning back. Am J Transplant 2019;19(8):2151–2152. DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15413. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Puri V, Hachem RR, Frye CC, et al. Unintended consequences of changes to lung allocation policy. Am J Transplant 2019;19(8):2164–2167. DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15307. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Daud SA, Yusen RD, Meyers BF, et al. Impact of immediate primary lung allograft dysfunction on bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007;175(5):507–13. (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dop... ). - PubMed
    1. Diamond JM, Lee JC, Kawut SM, et al. Clinical risk factors for primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013;187(5):527–34. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201210-1865OC. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types