Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 5;3(8):e222826.
doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.2826.

Association of Medicare Advantage Premiums With Measures of Quality and Patient Experience

Affiliations

Association of Medicare Advantage Premiums With Measures of Quality and Patient Experience

Amelia M Haviland et al. JAMA Health Forum. .

Abstract

Importance: Quality of care varies substantially across Medicare Advantage plans. The price information that Medicare Advantage enrollees are most likely to consider when selecting a Medicare Advantage plan is the monthly premium. Enrollees may select plans to minimize premium or, alternatively, use premium as a proxy for quality and select plans with higher premiums; however, quality implications of these choices are unknown.

Objective: To determine the extent to which the quality of care offered by Medicare Advantage plans varies within vs across premium levels.

Design, setting, and participants: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of the population enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans in 2016 to 2017 using clinical quality measures from the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS), patient experience measures from the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) surveys, and administrative data. Data were analyzed from March 2021 to March 2022.

Exposures: Medicare Advantage monthly premium.

Main outcomes and measures: Ten publicly reported 2017 HEDIS measures and 5 publicly reported 2017 CAHPS measures linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale.

Results: The 168 968 Medicare Advantage CAHPS respondents were representative of the enrollee population (14% were <65 years old and eligible through disability; 24% ≥80 years old; sex and race/ethnicity data were not considered); 40% were in 591 plans with no monthly premiums and less than 6% were in 144 plans with monthly premiums of $120 or more. There were from 77 054 to 2 139 422 enrollees by HEDIS measure. Among all Medicare Advantage enrollees, 79% were in plans with either a $0 premium or a low monthly premium (≤$60); patient experience and clinical quality were generally similar in these 2 categories of plans. To a small extent, enrollees in moderately high ($60-$120) and high (≥$120) premium plans reported better patient experience (+1.4 [95% CI, 0.7-2.1] and 2.2 [95% CI, 1.5-2.9] points) and received better clinical care (1.4 [95% CI, 0.3-2.5] to 3.3 [5% CI, 2.1-4.5] percentage points on most measures than those with $0 and low-premium plans. Quality differences within each premium level category were substantial; the within-premium category plan-level SDs were 6.5 points and 7.2 percentage points for patient experience and clinical quality, respectively. A plan at the 50th percentile of clinical quality and patient experience in the high premium category would fall in the 65th and 62nd percentile within the $0-premium category, respectively.

Conclusions and relevance: This population-based cross-sectional study found that although quality of care and patient experience were slightly higher with higher-premium plans, quality varied widely within each premium category. High-quality care and patient experience were found in each price category. Thus, paying higher premiums is not necessary for higher quality care in Medicare Advantage plans. Greater engagement of enrollees and advocates with quality of care and patient experience information for Medicare Advantage plan selection is recommended.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Ma reported former employment with the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation and the National Quality Forum during the initial conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Differences in Patient Experiences Within and Between Plan Premium Categories (CAHPS composite, 0-100 scale)
The gray box indicates 1 SD (67%) of plans, the whiskers indicate 2 SD (95%) of plans, and the dark line shows the mean quality. Mean quality at each premium level from Table 2 (see also eTables 2A and 2B in the Supplement); plan SDs from models in eAppendix A in the Supplement; and CAHPS indicates Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Differences in Clinical Quality Within and Between Plan Premium Categories (HEDIS composite, 0-100 scale)
The gray box indicates 1 SD (67%) of plans, the whiskers indicate 2 SD (95%) of plans, and the dark line shows the mean quality. Mean quality at each premium level from Table 2 (see also eTables 2A and 2B in the Supplement); plan SDs from models in eAppendix A in the Supplement; and HEDIS indicates Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set.

Comment in

References

    1. Kirzinger A, Muñana C, Wu B, Brodie M. Data Note: Americans’ Challenges With Health Care Costs. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2019.
    1. Blendon RJ, Brodie M, Benson JM, Altman DE, Buhr T. Americans’ views of health care costs, access, and quality. Milbank Q. 2006;84(4):623-657. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2006.00463.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perez SL, Gosdin M, Pintor JK, Romano PS. Consumers’ perceptions and choices related to three value-based insurance design approaches. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019;38(3):456-463. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05048 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jacobson G, Freed M, Damico A, Neuman T. A Dozen Facts About Medicare Advantage in 2019. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2019.
    1. Martino SC, Kanouse DE, Miranda DJ, Elliott MN. Can a More user-friendly Medicare plan finder improve consumers’ selection of Medicare plans? Health Serv Res. 2017;52(5):1749-1771. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12582 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types