Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with or without anesthesiologist: results from a high-volume single center
- PMID: 36219144
- DOI: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001391
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with or without anesthesiologist: results from a high-volume single center
Abstract
Aims: Local instead of general anesthesia has become the standard approach in many centers for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). New generation devices and an increase in operator skills had led to a drastic reduction in periprocedural complications, bringing in the adoption of a minimalist approach. In our study, we aimed to compare patients treated with TAVR under local anesthesia with or without the presence of an anesthesiologist on site (AOS).
Methods: We compare procedural aspects and results of patients treated with TAVR with an AOS against patients treated with TAVR with an anesthesiologist on call (AOC). From January 2019 to December 2020, all consecutive patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR with either the self-expandable Evolut (Medtronic, MN, USA) or balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 (Edwards Lifesciences, CA, USA) were collected.
Results: Of 332 patients collected, 96 (29%) were treated with TAVR with AOS, while 236 (71%) were treated with TAVR with AOC. No differences in procedural time, fluoroscopy time and amount of contrast medium were observed. No procedural death and conversion to open-chest surgery was reported. The rate of stroke/transient ischemic attacks and major vascular complications was similar in the two groups. No patients in both groups required conversion to general anesthesia. Two patients (0.8%) in the AOC group required urgent intervention of the anesthesiologist. In the AOC group, there was a greater use of morphine (55.9% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.008), but with a lower dose for each patient (2.0 vs. 2.8 mg, P = 0.006). On the other hand, there was a lower use of other painkiller drugs (3.4% vs. 20.8%, P = 0.001). No difference in inotropic drugs use was observed.
Conclusion: In patients at low or intermediate risk undergoing transfemoral TAVR, a safe procedure can be performed under local anesthesia without the presence of an anesthesiologist in the catheterization laboratory.
Copyright © 2022 Italian Federation of Cardiology - I.F.C. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Streamlining transcatheter aortic valve implantation: minimalist procedure, maximalist planning.J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2022 Dec 1;23(12):807-808. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001392. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2022. PMID: 36349945 No abstract available.
References
-
- Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, Milojevic M, Baldus S, Bauersachs J, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 2022; 43:561–632.
-
- Wood DA, Lauck SB, Cairns JA, Humphries KH, Cook R, Welsh R, et al. The Vancouver 3 M (Multidisciplinary, Multimodality, But Minimalist) clinical pathway facilitates safe next-day discharge home at low-, medium- and high-volume transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement centers: the 3M TAVR Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2019; 12:459–469.
-
- Thiele H, Kurz T, Feistritzer HJ, Stachel G, Hartung P, Lurz P, et al. General versus local anesthesia with conscious sedation in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the randomized SOLVE-TAVI Trial. Circulation 2020; 142:1437–1447.
-
- Harjai KJ, Bules T, Berger A, Young B, Singh D, Carter R, et al. Efficiency, safety, and quality of life after transcatheter aortic valve implantation performed with moderate sedation versus general anesthesia. Am J Cardiol 2020; 125:1088–1095.
-
- Petronio AS, Giannini C, De Carlo M, Bedogni F, Colombo A, Tamburino C, et al. Anaesthetic management of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: results from the Italian CoreValve registry. Eurointervention 2016; 12:381–388.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous