Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Jan;38(1):81-89.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07791-z. Epub 2022 Oct 11.

Home Blood Pressure Self-monitoring plus Self-titration of Antihypertensive Medication for Poorly Controlled Hypertension in Primary Care: the ADAMPA Randomized Clinical Trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Home Blood Pressure Self-monitoring plus Self-titration of Antihypertensive Medication for Poorly Controlled Hypertension in Primary Care: the ADAMPA Randomized Clinical Trial

Patricia Martínez-Ibáñez et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Patient empowerment through pharmacological self-management is a common strategy in some chronic diseases such as diabetes, but it is rarely used for controlling blood pressure.

Objective: This study aimed to assess self-monitoring plus self-titration of antihypertensive medication versus usual care for reducing systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 12 months in poorly controlled hypertensive patients.

Design: The ADAMPA study was a pragmatic, controlled, randomized, non-masked clinical trial with two parallel arms in Valencia, Spain.

Participants: Hypertensive patients older than 40 years, with SBP over 145 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) over 90 mmHg, were recruited from July 2017 to June 2018.

Intervention: Participants were randomized 1:1 to usual care versus an individualized, pre-arranged plan based on self-monitoring plus self-titration.

Main measure: The primary outcome was the adjusted mean difference (AMD) in SBP between groups at 12 months.

Key results: Primary outcome data were available for 312 patients (intervention n=156, control n=156) of the 366 who were initially recruited. The AMD in SBP at 12 months (main analysis) was -2.9 mmHg (95% CI, -5.9 to 0.1, p=0.061), while the AMD in DBP was -1.9 mmHg (95% CI, -3.7 to 0.0, p=0.052). The results of the subgroup analysis were consistent with these for the main outcome measures. More patients in the intervention group achieved good blood pressure control (<140/90 mmHg) at 12 months than in the control group (55.8% vs 42.3%, difference 13.5%, 95% CI, 2.5 to 24.5%, p=0.017). At 12 months, no differences were observed in behavior, quality of life, use of health services, or adverse events.

Conclusion: Self-monitoring plus self-titration of antihypertensive medication based on an individualized pre-arranged plan used in primary care may be a promising strategy for reducing blood pressure at 12 months compared to usual care, without increasing healthcare utilization or adverse events.

Trial registration: EudraCT, number 2016-003986-25 (registered 17 March 2017) and clinicaltrials.gov , NCT03242785.

Keywords: blood pressure self-management; blood pressure self-monitoring; patient empowerment; primary care; randomized clinical trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ADAMPA patient flow chart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean difference in systolic blood pressure between intervention and control groups at 12 months’ follow-up by pre-specified subgroups. CI, confidence interval; SBP, systolic blood pressure. aOther comorbidities include cerebrovascular disease, peripheral artery disease, chronic artery disease, chronic kidney disease, angina, and acute myocardial infarction.

References

    1. Muntner P, Carey RM, Gidding S, et al. Potential US Population Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA High Blood Pressure Guideline. Circulation. 2018;137(2):109–18. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032582. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Timmis A, Townsend N, Gale C, et al. European Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2017. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(7):508–79. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx628. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mills K, Bund JD, Kelly TN, et al. Global Disparities of hypertension Prevalence and control a systematic analysis of Population-Based studies From 90 countries. Circulation. 2016;134:441–50. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018912. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2224–60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. GBD 2017 Risk Factor Collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392:1923-94. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Associated data