Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jan 1;44(1):e56-e65.
doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000001134. Epub 2022 Oct 11.

Research Gaps in Fragile X Syndrome: An Updated Literature Review to Inform Clinical and Public Health Practice

Affiliations
Review

Research Gaps in Fragile X Syndrome: An Updated Literature Review to Inform Clinical and Public Health Practice

Melissa Raspa et al. J Dev Behav Pediatr. .

Abstract

Objective: The phenotypic impact of fragile X syndrome (FXS) has been well-documented since the discovery of the fragile X messenger ribonucleoprotein 1 gene 30 years ago. However, gaps remain in clinical and public health research. The purpose of this literature review was to determine the extent to which these gaps have been addressed and identify targeted areas of future research.

Methods: We conducted an electronic search of several scientific databases using a variety of key words. The search focused on 5 areas identified as research gaps by an earlier review: (1) diagnosis, (2) phenotypic presentation, (3) familial impact, (4) interventions and treatments, and (5) life span perspectives. Inclusion criteria included publication between 2014 and 2020, focus on human subjects, and publication in English. A total of 480 articles were identified, 365 were reviewed, and 112 are summarized in this review.

Results: Results are organized into the following categories: (1) FXS phenotype and subtypes (FXS subtypes, medical profile, cognitive/developmental profile, social and behavioral profile); (2) needs of adults; (3) public health needs (clinical diagnosis and newborn screening, health care needs, and access); (4) treatment (treatment priorities, pharmacological treatments, and behavioral and educational interventions); and (5) families (economic burden and mother-child relationship).

Conclusion: Despite the progress in many areas of FXS research, work remains to address gaps in clinical and public health knowledge. We pose 3 main areas of focused research, including early detection and diagnosis, determinants of health, and development and implementation of targeted interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram.

References

    1. Raspa M, Wheeler AC, Riley C. Public health literature review of fragile X syndrome. Pediatrics. 2017;139:S153–S171. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Covidence Systematic Review Software [Computer Program]. Melbourne VIC, Australia: Veritas Health Innovation; 2020.
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Plos Med. 2009;6:e1000097. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Salcedo-Arellano MJ, Dufour B, McLennan Y, et al. . Fragile X syndrome and associated disorders: clinical aspects and pathology. Neurobiol Dis. 2020;136:104740. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Razak KA, Dominick KC, Erickson CA. Developmental studies in fragile X syndrome. J Neurodev Disord. 2020;12:13. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types