Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun;30(2):87-91.
doi: 10.1177/09691413221127583. Epub 2022 Oct 11.

Did the use of open invitations in place of timed appointment invitations reduce the uptake of breast screening in the London region during the COVID-19 recovery?

Sue M Hudson  1 , Kathie Binysh  2 , Stephen W Duffy  3
Affiliations

Did the use of open invitations in place of timed appointment invitations reduce the uptake of breast screening in the London region during the COVID-19 recovery?

Sue M Hudson et al. J Med Screen. 2023 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: The Covid-19 pandemic created a backlog of women awaiting an invitation for breast screening in the UK. To recover in a timely fashion, the National Health Service programme opted to issue open invitations (OI) to women rather than the standard pre-booked timed appointments (TA). Historically, OIs have been shown to result in lower uptake. The aim of this study was to make use of a natural experiment to compare uptake in groups sent an OI with those sent a TA during a period when both invitation methods were in use.

Methods: Women invited for routine screening at one of the six London breast screening services from September 2020 to March 2021 were included and grouped according to the type of invitation they had received (TA or OI). The outcome was attendance within 6 months of opening the screening episode. Data were analysed by logistic regression.

Results: During the period of the study, 78,192 (32.5%) women received a TA and 162,680 (67.5%) received an OI. In the TA group, 47,391 (60.6%) attended within six months of offered appointment and in the OI group 86,430 (53.1%) attended. This difference was significant (p < 0.001). The odds ratio (95% CI) for the attended outcome was 1.44 (1.33-1.55) adjusted for differences in deprivation and for invitation category (first invitation or subsequent invitation).

Conclusions: This study supports the view that TA delivers a higher uptake than OI. It suggests that during this period over 12,000 women in London, who would have been expected to attend if given the standard TA, did not attend their appointment having received an OI.

Keywords: Breast screening; timed appointments; uptake.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The conclusions and views in this paper are those of the authors and not of NHS England or NHS Improvement.

References

    1. Duffy SW, Myles JP, Maroni Ret al.et al.Rapid review of evaluation of interventions to improve participation in cancer screening services. J Med Screen 2017; 24: 127–145. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allgood PC, Maroni R, Hudson S, et al.Effect of second timed apointments for non-attenders of breast cancer screening in England: a randomised control trial. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18: 972–980. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Segnan N, Senore C, Giordano Let al.et al.Promoting participation in a population screening program for breast and cervical cancer: a randomized trial of different invitation strategies. Tumori 1998; 84: 348–353. - PubMed
    1. English indices of deprivation 2019, https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/english-indices-of-deprivation-... (last accessed 28th August 2022).
    1. 2011 Census Guidance and Methodology, https://www.ons.gov.uk/census/2011census/2011censusdata/2011censususergu... (last accessed 26th August 2022).