Automated blood pressure measuring devices: how are they clinically validated for accuracy?
- PMID: 36220909
- DOI: 10.1038/s41371-022-00761-2
Automated blood pressure measuring devices: how are they clinically validated for accuracy?
Abstract
Accurate blood pressure (BP) assessment is essential for the optimal diagnosis and management of hypertension. Contemporary clinical practice guidelines strongly endorse use of automated cuff blood pressure measuring devices (BPMD) as the preferred means of measuring and monitoring BP in the office, at home and with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. To ensure that they are accurate, automated BPMDs should undergo clinical validation testing, performed using an established clinical validation standard. Unfortunately, most BPMDs sold on the global market have not been clinically validated. Furthermore, in the last thirty years, several different clinical validation protocols have been published, with major differences apparent between these standards, causing controversy with respect to which standard is considered acceptable for clinical validation. Complexly worded standards, multiple revisions, and firewalled access also contribute to a lack of understanding and use of clinical validation standards and the number of expert centers performing clinical validations is small. Recently, joint society collaborations have led to creation of the AAMI/ESH/ISO universal standard for the clinical validation of automated cuff BPMDs. Not only is this unified standard a necessary step, but oversight from regulators and influential stakeholders to ensure that only clinically validated BPMDs can be marketed is additionally needed.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
References
-
- Global Burden of Disease Risk Factor Collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392:1923–94. - DOI
-
- Kaplan NM, Commentary on the sixth report of the Joint National Committee (JNC-6). Am J Hypertens. 1998;11:134–6.
-
- Instrumentation AFTAOM. American national standards for electronic or automated sphygmomanometers. ANSI/AAMI SP 10-1987, Arlington VA, USA: Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation; 1987.
-
- International Organization for Standardization. ISO 81060-2:2018. Non-invasive sphygmomanometers - Part 2: clinical investigation of intermittent automated measurement type. 2018. https://www.iso.org/standard/73339.html .
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
