Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 1;27(1):97-101.
doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000710. Epub 2022 Oct 12.

Colposcopy Standards: Guidelines for Endocervical Curettage at Colposcopy

Affiliations

Colposcopy Standards: Guidelines for Endocervical Curettage at Colposcopy

L Stewart Massad et al. J Low Genit Tract Dis. .

Abstract

Objective: The most recent guidelines for colposcopy practice in the United States, the 2017 Colposcopy Standards Consensus Guidelines, did not include recommendations for endocervical curettage (ECC). This document provides updated guidelines for use of ECC among patients referred for colposcopy.

Methods: Consensus guidelines for the use of ECC were developed in 2012. To update these guidelines in concordance with the 2017 Colposcopy Standards process, an expert workgroup was convened in 2021. Literature had been previously reviewed through 2011, before the 2012 guideline. Literature from the years 2012-2021 and data from the NCI Biopsy study were reviewed, focusing on the additional yield of ECC.

Results: Endocervical curettage is recommended for patients with high-grade cytology, human papillomavirus 16/18 infection, positive results on dual staining for p16/Ki67, for those previously treated for known or suspected cervical precancer or considering observation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2, and when the squamocolumnar junction is not fully visualized at colposcopy. Endocervical curettage is preferred for all patients aged older than 40 years. Endocervical curettage is acceptable for all nonpregnant patients undergoing colposcopy but may be omitted when a subsequent excisional procedure is planned, the endocervical canal does not admit a sampling device, or in nulliparous patients aged younger than 30 years, with cytology reported as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion regardless of whether the squamocolumnar junction is fully visualized. Endocervical curettage is unacceptable in pregnancy.

Conclusions: These guidelines for ECC add to the 2017 consensus recommendations for colposcopy practice in the United States.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

L.S.M. has testified in malpractice cases alleging delay in cervical cancer diagnosis. No authors received compensation from ASCCP for guidelines development. The other authors have declared they have no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Wright TC Jr. Massad LS Dunton CJ, et al. 2006 ASCCP-sponsored consensus conference . 2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical screening tests. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2007;11:201–22. - PubMed
    1. Massad LS Einstein MH Huh WK, et al. 2012 ASCCP Consensus Guidelines Conference . 2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2013;17:S1–S27. - PubMed
    1. Wentzensen N Massad LS Mayeaux EJ Jr., et al. . Evidence-based consensus recommendations for colposcopy practice for cervical cancer prevention in the United States. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2017;21:216–22. - PubMed
    1. Oliveira MM, Farias-Eisner RP, Pitkin RM. Endocervical sampling by Kevorkian curette or Pipelle aspiration device: a randomized comparison. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172:1889–92. - PubMed
    1. Ferris DG Cox JT O'Connor DM, et al. . Modern Colposcopy. 2nd ed. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt; 2004:161–4.