The influence of different placement techniques on the clinical success of bulk-fill resin composites placed in Class II cavities: a 4-year randomized controlled clinical study
- PMID: 36222961
- DOI: 10.1007/s00784-022-04749-7
The influence of different placement techniques on the clinical success of bulk-fill resin composites placed in Class II cavities: a 4-year randomized controlled clinical study
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this double-blind and split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the clinical success of the placement technique (bulk-filling and incremental techniques) of a bulk-fill resin composite in Class II carious lesions.
Materials and methods: Two different bulk-fill resin composites, X-tra fil (Voco) and Filtek Bulk Fill (3M ESPE), were used in the bulk-filling and incremental techniques for 20 patients. The study was carried out in 4 groups, with 20 restorations in each group. Restorations were appraised at baseline, 6-month, 2-year, and 4-year recall. World Dental Federation (FDI) and the US Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria were used in the evaluations. The Friedman, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for the statistical analysis.
Results: At the end of year 4, there was no loss of restoration in any group. According to the USPHS and FDI criteria, there was a difference in the baseline and 4-year in marginal adaptation and marginal discoloration of the restorations (P < 0.05). When Filtek-Bulk was placed as an incremental technique, there was a minor fracture in four restorations (P > 0.05). In addition, Filtek-Bulk showed a color change according to the results based on both the USPHS and FDI criteria (P < 0.05). The difference between the two placement techniques of each resin composite was not significant at the year 4 recall when all criteria were evaluated (P ˃ 0.05).
Conclusions: The 4-year clinical success of the evaluated bulk-fill composites is not dependent on the placement technique used.
Clinical relevance: This study can help clinicians choose which technique (bulk fill and incremental techniques) bulk-fill composites can be used.
Trial registration: US National Library of Medicine, www.
Clinicaltrials: gov , ID: NCT04565860 Registered on 10/09/2020. Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill resin Composites in Class II Restorations.
Keywords: Bulk technique; Bulk-fill resin composite; FDI; Incremental technique; Resin composite; USPHS.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Moraschini V, Fai CK, Alto RM, Dos Santos GO (2015) Amalgam and resin composite longevity of posterior restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 43:1043–1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.06.005 - DOI
-
- Turkun LS, Aktaner BO, Ates M (2003) Clinical evaluation of different posterior resin composite materials: One 7-year report. Quintessence Int 34:418–426
-
- Kwon Y, Ferracane J, Lee IB (2012) Effect of layering methods, composite type, and flowable liner on the polymerization shrinkage stress of light cured composites. Dent Mater 28:801–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.028 - DOI
-
- Alrahlah A, Silikas N, Watts DC (2014) Post-cure depth of cure of bulk fill dental resin-composites. Dent Mater 30:149–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.10.011 - DOI
-
- Schneider LF, Cavalcante LM, Silikas N (2010) Shrinkage stresses generated during resin-composite applications: a review. J Dent Biomech 131630. https://doi.org/10.4061/2010/131630
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
