Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 12;17(10):e0275033.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275033. eCollection 2022.

Automatic multi-anatomical skull structure segmentation of cone-beam computed tomography scans using 3D UNETR

Affiliations

Automatic multi-anatomical skull structure segmentation of cone-beam computed tomography scans using 3D UNETR

Maxime Gillot et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The segmentation of medical and dental images is a fundamental step in automated clinical decision support systems. It supports the entire clinical workflow from diagnosis, therapy planning, intervention, and follow-up. In this paper, we propose a novel tool to accurately process a full-face segmentation in about 5 minutes that would otherwise require an average of 7h of manual work by experienced clinicians. This work focuses on the integration of the state-of-the-art UNEt TRansformers (UNETR) of the Medical Open Network for Artificial Intelligence (MONAI) framework. We trained and tested our models using 618 de-identified Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) volumetric images of the head acquired with several parameters from different centers for a generalized clinical application. Our results on a 5-fold cross-validation showed high accuracy and robustness with a Dice score up to 0.962±0.02. Our code is available on our public GitHub repository.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Multi-anatomical skull structure manual segmentation of the full-face by combining the mandible, the maxilla, the cranial base, the cervical vertebra, and the skin segmentation.
Patient has written consent on file for the use of the images.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Visualization of the contrast adjustment steps on two different scans.
This result is obtained by keeping the data between Xmin = 1% and Xmax = 99% on the cumulative graph.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Overview of the UNETR used.
A 128x128x128x1 cropped volume of the input CBCT is divided into a sequence of 16 patches and projected into an embedding space using a linear layer. A transformer model is fed with the sequence added with 768 position embedding. Via skip connections, the decoder will extract and merge the final 128x128x128x2 crop segmentation from the encoded representations of different layers in the transformer.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Visualization of the automatic maxilla segmentation steps.
Re-sample and contrast adjustment of the input image, segmentation with the sliding window using UNETR, and finally, re-sampling of the cleaned-up segmentation to the input size.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Visualization of the automatic full-face segmentation results.
In red, the prediction is superposed with the manual segmentation in transparent green. On the full-face, we can see that the models managed to average the separation line between the maxilla and the mandible. The separation on the manual segmentation is different. It also explains why the metrics are lower than the mandible for those two skull structures.
Fig 6
Fig 6. 3D Slicer module in development for AMASSS-CBCT.
On the left, we can see the module with the different options/parameters. On the right, the visualisation of the segmentation applied on one small field of view scan with the selected skull structures. The mandible in red, the maxilla in yellow and the root canals in green.

References

    1. Way TW, Hadjiiski LM, Sahiner B, Chan HP, Cascade PN, Kazerooni EA, et al. Computer-aided diagnosis of pulmonary nodules on CT scans: Segmentation and classification using 3D active contours. Medical physics. 2006;33(7Part1):2323–2337. doi: 10.1118/1.2207129 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. D D’Haese PF, Duay V, Li R, du Bois d’Aische A, Merchant TE, Cmelak AJ, et al. Automatic segmentation of brain structures for radiation therapy planning. In: Medical Imaging 2003: Image Processing. vol. 5032. International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2003. p. 517–526.
    1. Fang X, Xu S, Wood BJ, Yan P. Deep learning-based liver segmentation for fusion-guided intervention. International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery. 2020;15(6):963–972. doi: 10.1007/s11548-020-02147-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gaviño Orduña J, García García M, Dominguez P, Caviedes Bucheli J, Martin Biedma B, Abella Sans F, et al. Successful pulp revascularization of an autotransplantated mature premolar with fragile fracture apicoectomy and plasma rich in growth factors: a 3-year follow-up. International Endodontic Journal. 2020;53(3):421–433. doi: 10.1111/iej.13230 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yushkevich PA, Piven J, Hazlett HC, Smith RG, Ho S, Gee JC, et al. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage. 2006;31(3):1116–1128. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.015 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms