Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Dec;25(e1):e49-e57.
doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2022-300530. Epub 2022 Oct 12.

Can we mitigate the psychological impacts of social isolation using behavioural activation? Long-term results of the UK BASIL urgent public health COVID-19 pilot randomised controlled trial and living systematic review

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Can we mitigate the psychological impacts of social isolation using behavioural activation? Long-term results of the UK BASIL urgent public health COVID-19 pilot randomised controlled trial and living systematic review

Elizabeth Littlewood et al. Evid Based Ment Health. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Behavioural and cognitive interventions remain credible approaches in addressing loneliness and depression. There was a need to rapidly generate and assimilate trial-based data during COVID-19.

Objectives: We undertook a parallel pilot RCT of behavioural activation (a brief behavioural intervention) for depression and loneliness (Behavioural Activation in Social Isolation, the BASIL-C19 trial ISRCTN94091479). We also assimilate these data in a living systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42021298788) of cognitive and/or behavioural interventions.

Methods: Participants (≥65 years) with long-term conditions were computer randomised to behavioural activation (n=47) versus care as usual (n=49). Primary outcome was PHQ-9. Secondary outcomes included loneliness (De Jong Scale). Data from the BASIL-C19 trial were included in a metanalysis of depression and loneliness.

Findings: The 12 months adjusted mean difference for PHQ-9 was -0.70 (95% CI -2.61 to 1.20) and for loneliness was -0.39 (95% CI -1.43 to 0.65).The BASIL-C19 living systematic review (12 trials) found short-term reductions in depression (standardised mean difference (SMD)=-0.31, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.11) and loneliness (SMD=-0.48, 95% CI -0.70 to -0.27). There were few long-term trials, but there was evidence of some benefit (loneliness SMD=-0.20, 95% CI -0.40 to -0.01; depression SMD=-0.20, 95% CI -0.47 to 0.07).

Discussion: We delivered a pilot trial of a behavioural intervention targeting loneliness and depression; achieving long-term follow-up. Living meta-analysis provides strong evidence of short-term benefit for loneliness and depression for cognitive and/or behavioural approaches. A fully powered BASIL trial is underway.

Clinical implications: Scalable behavioural and cognitive approaches should be considered as population-level strategies for depression and loneliness on the basis of a living systematic review.

Keywords: Adult psychiatry; Depression & mood disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: We have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests. DE and CCG were committee members for the NICE Depression Guideline (update) Development Group between 2015 and 2022, and SiG was a member between 2015 and 2018. SiG, PC and DM are supported by the NIHR Yorkshire and Humberside Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) and DE is supported by the North East and North Cumbria ARCs. CCG is part funded by West Midland ARC.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Basil CONSORT flow diagram. CONSORT, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Living meta-analysis of behavioural and cognitive trials targeting loneliness in socially isolated populations. SMD, standardised mean difference.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Living meta-analysis of behavioural and cognitive trials targeting depression in socially isolated populations. SMD, standardised mean difference.

References

    1. Patel K, Robertson E, Kwong ASF, et al. . Psychological distress before and during the COVID-19 pandemic among adults in the United Kingdom based on coordinated analyses of 11 longitudinal studies. JAMA Netw Open 2022;5:e227629-e. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.7629 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Steptoe A, Di Gessa G. Mental health and social interactions of older people with physical disabilities in England during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet Public Health 2021;6:e365–73. 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00069-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Santini ZI, Jose PE, York Cornwell E, et al. . Social disconnectedness, perceived isolation, and symptoms of depression and anxiety among older Americans (NSHAP): a longitudinal mediation analysis. Lancet Public Health 2020;5:e62–70. 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30230-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee SL, Pearce E, Ajnakina O, et al. . The association between loneliness and depressive symptoms among adults aged 50 years and older: a 12-year population-based cohort study. Lancet Psychiatry 2021;8:48–57. 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30383-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Valtorta NK, Kanaan M, Gilbody S, et al. . Loneliness, social isolation and risk of cardiovascular disease in the English longitudinal study of ageing. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2018;25:1387–96. 10.1177/2047487318792696 - DOI - PubMed