Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 12;12(1):17122.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21666-7.

Risk factors for globe removal after open-globe injury in agricultural regions

Affiliations

Risk factors for globe removal after open-globe injury in agricultural regions

Orapan Aryasit et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the prevalence and risk factors for globe removal among patients with open-globe injuries (OGIs) in agricultural regions. A retrospective chart review of patients with OGIs was performed between January 2010 and December 2019. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify the factors associated with globe removal in OGI. This study included 422 patients (422 eyes). The highest prevalence of OGI was observed in the middle age group (> 20 to 40 years). The most common cause of OGIs was agriculture-related injury (54.7%), followed by industry or workplace-related injury (20.4%), and assault (5.0%). Intraocular foreign bodies, endophthalmitis, and panophthalmitis were reported in 57.6%, 28.4%, and 5.7% of cases, respectively. Eight eviscerations and 43 enucleations were performed, accounting for 12.1% of OGIs. The most common indication for globe removal was panophthalmitis. Multivariable analysis revealed that the predictive factors significantly associated with globe removal were assault injuries (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 5.53; p = 0.026), presenting logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity (aOR = 311.79; p < 0.001), and endophthalmitis and panophthalmitis (aOR = 3.58 and 734.94, respectively; p < 0.001). This knowledge would aid in patient counseling and encourage health promotion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Négrel AD, Thylefors B. The global impact of eye injuries. Ophthalmic. Epidemiol. 1998;5:143–169. doi: 10.1076/opep.5.3.143.8364. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Supreeyathitikul P, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes following open globe injury in agricultural region, an 11-year experience. Ophthalmic. Epidemiol. 2020;27:246–251. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2020.1716381. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beshay N, et al. The epidemiology of open globe injuries presenting to a tertiary referral eye hospital in Australia. Injury. 2017;48:1348–1354. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.035. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Okamoto Y, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of open globe injuries in Japan. Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. 2019;63:109–118. doi: 10.1007/s10384-018-0638-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ababneh OH, AboTaleb EA, Abu Ameerh MA, Yousef YA. Enucleation and evisceration at a tertiary care hospital in a developing country. BMC. Ophthalmol. 2015;15:120. doi: 10.1186/s12886-015-0108-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed