Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 12;10(1):15.
doi: 10.1186/s40170-022-00291-y.

Scaffold-mediated switching of lymphoma metabolism in culture

Affiliations

Scaffold-mediated switching of lymphoma metabolism in culture

Rachana Bhatt et al. Cancer Metab. .

Abstract

Background: Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and accounts for about a third of all NHL cases. A significant proportion (~40%) of treated DLBCL patients develop refractory or relapsed disease due to drug resistance which can be attributed to metabolomic and genetic variations amongst diverse DLBCL subtypes. An assay platform that reproduces metabolic patterns of DLBCL in vivo could serve as a useful model for DLBCL.

Methods: This report investigated metabolic functions in 2D and 3D cell cultures using parental and drug-resistant DLBCL cell lines as compared to patient biopsy tissue.

Results: A 3D culture model controlled the proliferation of parental and drug-resistant DLBCL cell lines, SUDHL-10, SUDHL-10 RR (rituximab resistant), and SUDHL-10 OR (obinutuzumab resistant), as well as retained differential sensitivity to CHOP. The results from metabolic profiling and isotope tracer studies with D-glucose-13C6 indicated metabolic switching in 3D culture when compared with a 2D environment. Analysis of DLBCL patient tumor tissue revealed that the metabolic changes in 3D grown cells were shifted towards that of clinical specimens.

Conclusion: 3D culture restrained DLBCL cell line growth and modulated metabolic pathways that trend towards the biological characteristics of patient tumors. Counter-intuitively, this research thereby contends that 3D matrices can be a tool to control tumor function towards a slower growing and metabolically dormant state that better reflects in vivo tumor physiology.

Keywords: 3D model; DLBCL; Drug sensitivity; Lymphoma; Metabolic flux; Proliferation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

R.B, D.R., and B.P. declare that they have no competing interests. A.M.E. receives an honorarium from Advisory board Bayer, Seattle Genetics, Affimed, Verastem, Pharmacyclics, Research to Practice, and Physician Education Resource and research support: Takeda, Seattle Genetics, Merck, NIH/NCI, Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, and ORIEN

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic representation of expansion and recovery of DLBCL cell lines in 3D hydrogel “VitroGel®”
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cell proliferation profile of A SUDHL-10, B SUDHL-10 RR, and C SUDHL-10 OR and D doubling time variations of all three cell lines in 2D and 3D. Values indicate mean± SD. Experiments were done in triplicate. A 2-tailed t-test was used to determine significance between 2D and 3D denoted by *** (p<0.0001), ** (p<0.005), and * (p<0.05)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Quantification of SUDHL-10 cell cycle analysis performed using flow cytometry from three independent experiments A overlay plot, day 1 (B) and day 5 (C). Values indicate mean ± SD. Experiments were done in triplicate. A 2-tailed t-test was used to determine significance between 2D and 3D denoted by *** (p<0.0001), ** (p<0.005) and * (p<0.05)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Effect of CHOP on the viability of SUDHL-10 (A), SUDHL-10 RR (B), and SUDHL-10 OR (C) in 2D and 3D determined by CCK-8 assay. Cells were allowed to grow for 24 h and then treated with increasing concentrations of CHOP for 48 h. Error bars represent the standard deviation of means from replicates consisting of three independent experiments. A 2-tailed t-test was used to determine significance ** (p<0.005) and * (p<0.05) when compared to 2D
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Metabolic profiling of DLBCL cell lines in 2D vs 3D. Analysis of extracellular metabolites using Cedex Bioanalyzer: A glucose, B glutamine, and C lactate. Data is normalized to the ratio of starting to final cell densities. Data obtained from n=3 repeats, values indicate mean± SD. A 2-tailed t-test was used to determine significance ** (p<0.005) and * (p<0.05). D LC-MS analysis of intracellular metabolite exhibiting differential pattern between 2D vs 3D
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
3D grown DLBCL cell lines show decreased nucleotide metabolism. A Total pool size of metabolites in SUDHL10, SUDHL10OR, and SUDHL10RR cells cultured in 2D vs 3D conditions for 48 h. B Summary of metabolic pathway changes represented by labels indicated in red (increased) or blue (decreased) in 3D cultured cells compared to 2D
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Comparison of DLBCL metabolite concentrations by quantitative mass spectrometry. Bar graphs represent the concentration of individual metabolites normalized per milligram of total protein (y-axis), in DLBCL tumors (n=10) and triplicates of SUDHL-10 cells cultured in 2D or 3D (x-axis). Error bars represent the standard deviation of means by replicates. Significant differences in metabolite concentration between the sample groups are denoted by *** (p<0.0001), ** (p<0.005), and * (p<0.05)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Roy D, et al. Interplay between cancer cell cycle and metabolism: challenges, targets and therapeutic opportunities. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;89:288–296. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.01.019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vinay DS, et al. Immune evasion in cancer: mechanistic basis and therapeutic strategies. Sem Cancer Biol. 2015;35:S185–S198. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2015.03.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Quail DF, Joyce JA. Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis. Nat Med. 2013;19(11):1423–1437. doi: 10.1038/nm.3394. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schulze A, Harris AL. How cancer metabolism is tuned for proliferation and vulnerable to disruption. Nature. 2012;491(7424):364–373. doi: 10.1038/nature11706. - DOI - PubMed