Risk factors associated with self-reported Q fever in Australian wildlife rehabilitators: Findings from an online survey
- PMID: 36225093
- PMCID: PMC10091799
- DOI: 10.1111/zph.13002
Risk factors associated with self-reported Q fever in Australian wildlife rehabilitators: Findings from an online survey
Abstract
Australian wildlife rehabilitators (AWR) are at increased risk of developing Q fever, a serious zoonotic disease caused by the intracellular bacterium Coxiella burnetii. Previous studies have suggested that Australian wildlife may be a potential C. burnetii infection source for humans. However, a recent serological survey of AWR found no association between C. burnetii exposure and direct contact with any wildlife species. To further explore the potential risk that wildlife may pose, this study aimed to identify associations between self-reported Q fever in AWR and risk factors for exposure to C. burnetii. An online cross-sectional survey was implemented in 2018 targeting AWR nationwide. Risk factors for self-reported Q fever were determined using multivariable logistic regression. Medically diagnosed Q fever was self-reported in 4.5% (13/287) of unvaccinated respondents. Rehabilitators who self-reported medically diagnosed Q fever were significantly more likely to: primarily rehabilitate wildlife at a veterinary clinic (OR 17.87, 95% CI: 3.09-110.92), have domestic ruminants residing on the property where they rehabilitate wildlife (OR 11.75, 95% CI: 2.91-57.42), have been educated at a High School/Technical and Further Education level (OR 10.29, 95% CI: 2.13-84.03) and be aged >50 years (OR 6.61, 95% CI: 1.60-38.35). No association was found between self-reported Q fever and direct contact with wildlife. These findings support previous work suggesting that AWR are at increased risk of C. burnetii infection and may develop Q fever potentially via exposure to traditional infection sources including livestock, other domestic animals, or contaminated environments, in association with their rehabilitation practices and lifestyle. Although Q fever vaccination is recommended for AWR, vaccine uptake is low in this population. Future studies should aim to determine the level of Q fever awareness and identify barriers to Q fever vaccination in this at-risk group. The difficulty in accessing the AWR population also highlights the need for a national centralized AWR database.
Keywords: Coxiella burnetii; Australia; Q fever; wildlife rehabilitators.
© 2022 The Authors. Zoonoses and Public Health published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Factors associated with Q fever vaccination in Australian wildlife rehabilitators.Vaccine. 2023 Jan 4;41(1):201-210. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.10.082. Epub 2022 Nov 21. Vaccine. 2023. PMID: 36424259
-
Coxiella burnetii seroprevalence and Q fever in Australian wildlife rehabilitators.One Health. 2020 Nov 21;12:100197. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2020.100197. eCollection 2021 Jun. One Health. 2020. PMID: 33319024 Free PMC article.
-
Q Fever (Coxiella burnetii) Knowledge and Attitudes of Australian Cat Breeders and Their Husbandry Practices.Zoonoses Public Health. 2017 Jun;64(4):252-261. doi: 10.1111/zph.12305. Epub 2016 Sep 13. Zoonoses Public Health. 2017. PMID: 27621095
-
Coxiella burnetii in wild mammals: A systematic review.Transbound Emerg Dis. 2019 Mar;66(2):662-671. doi: 10.1111/tbed.13085. Epub 2018 Dec 14. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2019. PMID: 30506629
-
The relevance of the wild reservoir in zoonotic multi-host pathogens: The links between Iberian wild mammals and Coxiella burnetii.Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022 Nov;69(6):3868-3880. doi: 10.1111/tbed.14758. Epub 2022 Nov 26. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022. PMID: 36335588 Review.
Cited by
-
Molecular detection and characterization of Coxiella burnetii in Australian native wildlife species.FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2025 Jan 10;372:fnaf060. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnaf060. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2025. PMID: 40577049 Free PMC article.
-
Methodological rigour and reporting quality of the literature on wildlife rescue, rehabilitation, and release: a global systematic review.Vet Q. 2025 Dec;45(1):1-12. doi: 10.1080/01652176.2025.2478138. Epub 2025 Apr 7. Vet Q. 2025. PMID: 40190231 Free PMC article.
-
The First Report of Coxiella burnetii as a Potential Neglected Pathogen of Acute Hepatitis of Unknown Causes in Egypt.Microorganisms. 2022 Oct 31;10(11):2168. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10112168. Microorganisms. 2022. PMID: 36363760 Free PMC article.
-
Coxiellosis in Livestock: Epidemiology, Public Health Significance, and Prevalence of Coxiella burnetii Infection in Ethiopia.Vet Med (Auckl). 2023 Aug 18;14:145-158. doi: 10.2147/VMRR.S418346. eCollection 2023. Vet Med (Auckl). 2023. PMID: 37614223 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Molecular survey and phylogenetic analysis of Bartonella sp., Coxiella sp., and hemoplamas in pudu (Pudu puda) from Chile: first report of Bartonella henselae in a wild ungulate species.Front Vet Sci. 2023 Nov 16;10:1161093. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1161093. eCollection 2023. Front Vet Sci. 2023. PMID: 38033637 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Australian Bureau of Statistics . (2018). Australian Demographic Statistics, Jun 2018 . https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/3101.0Jun%202018?Op...
-
- Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation . (2021). The Australian Immunisation Handbook, (March 4, 2022) . https://immunisationhandbook.health.gov.au/vaccine‐preventable‐diseases/...
-
- Bennett, M. D. , Woolford, L. , Banazis, M. J. , O'Hara, A. J. , Warren, K. S. , Nicholls, P. K. , Sims, C. , & Fenwick, S. G. (2011). Coxiella burnetii in western barred bandicoots (Perameles bougainville) from Bernier and Dorre Islands in Western Australia. EcoHealth, 8(4), 519–524. 10.1007/s10393-011-0729-3 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources