Perception towards vaccine effectiveness in controlling COVID-19 spread in rural and urban communities: A global survey
- PMID: 36225763
- PMCID: PMC9548880
- DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.958668
Perception towards vaccine effectiveness in controlling COVID-19 spread in rural and urban communities: A global survey
Abstract
Introduction: Several studies exhibited varying reports of perception toward vaccine effectiveness, vaccine hesitancy, and acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines. As this fluctuated with evidence generation, this study explored the perception toward vaccine effectiveness in rural and urban communities among various countries.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted online from April to August 2021 using convenience sampling among people from different countries approved by the Asia Metropolitan University Medical Research and Ethics. We adapted the questionnaire from the World Health Organization's (WHO) survey tool and guidance on COVID-19. The logistic regression models were performed to show perception toward vaccine effectiveness.
Results: A total of 5,673 participants responded to the online survey. Overall, 64% of participants agreed that the vaccine effectively controlled viral spread, and 23% agreed that there was no need for vaccination if others were vaccinated. Males had 14% higher odds of believing that there was no need for vaccination. Less social media users had 39% higher odds of developing the belief that there is no need for vaccination than all other people vaccinated.
Conclusion: People's perceptions toward vaccine acceptance have fluctuated with the information flow in various social media and the severity of COVID-19 cases. Therefore, it is important that the current scenario of peoples' perception toward vaccine acceptance and determinants affecting the acceptance are explored to promote the vaccination approach against COVID-19 prevention and transmission effectively.
Keywords: COVID-19; global study; perception towards vaccine effectiveness; predictors; vaccine acceptance.
Copyright © 2022 Marzo, Shrestha, Sapkota, Acharya, Shrestha, Pokharel, Ahmad, Patalinghug, Rahman, Salim, Bicer, Lotfizadeh, Wegdan, Moura Villela, Jermsittiparsert, Hamza, Saleeb, Respati, Fitriyana, Bhattacharya, Heidler, Qalati, Aung, Abid, Abeje, Pokhrel, Roien, King and Su.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Khatiwada AP, Maskey S, Shrestha N, Shrestha S, Khanal S, Kc B, et al. . Impact of the first phase of COVID-19 pandemic on childhood routine immunisation services in Nepal: a qualitative study on the perspectives of service providers and users. J Pharm Policy Pract. (2021) 14:1–10. 10.1186/s40545-021-00366-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Cascini F, Pantovic A, Al-Ajlouni Y, Failla G, Ricciardi W. Attitudes, acceptance and hesitancy among the general population worldwide to receive the COVID-19 vaccines and their contributing factors: A systematic review. EClinicalMedicine. (2021) 40:101113. 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101113 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous