Dietary assessment methods used in adult digital weight loss interventions: A systematic literature review
- PMID: 36226724
- DOI: 10.1111/jhn.13101
Dietary assessment methods used in adult digital weight loss interventions: A systematic literature review
Abstract
The effectiveness of the tailored feedback in digital interventions may be limited by the quality of the dietary assessment (DA) upon which it is based. The present study systematically reviewed studies reporting the protocols for DA methods used to inform tailored feedback in digital weight loss interventions. The search included: PubMed-National Library of Medicine database, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science and ProQuest. Search terms were related to five groups: dietary assessment, weight loss, clinical trials, technology and tailoring. Thirteen articles were eligible for inclusion. The most common DA method was a digital dietary record linked to a food database that provided instant feedback on daily energy intake. Only four studies provided feedback on overall diet quality and intake of fruit, vegetables and fibre. Dietary feedback was provided using text messages, email, mobile applications and online intervention websites. Most digital dietary feedback focused on reducing energy intake without providing feedback to enhance diet quality. This review highlighted the heterogeneity in DA methods used in tailored weight loss interventions, which may account for the range of outcome results reported. Future interventions should publish the protocols describing how dietary data was collected and used to inform dietary feedback.
Keywords: clinical trials; dietary assessment; systematic literature review; tailored feedback; technology; weight loss.
© 2022 The British Dietetic Association Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Collaborators GD. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2019;393(10184):1958-72.
-
- Marmot M, Bell R. Social determinants and non-communicable diseases: time for integrated action. BMJ. 2019;364:l251.
-
- Swinburn BA, Sacks G, Hall KD, McPherson K, Finegood DT, Moodie ML, et al. The global obesity pandemic: shaped by global drivers and local environments. Lancet. 2011;378(9793):804-14.
-
- Mullan B, Ntoumanis N, Thøgersen-Ntoumani C, Lipp OV. “It's a bit more complicated than that”: a broader perspective on determinants of obesity. Behav Brain Sci. 2017;40:e124.
-
- Dhurandhar EJ. The food-insecurity obesity paradox: a resource scarcity hypothesis. Physiol Behav. 2016;162:88-92.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
