Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 13;22(1):360.
doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01809-3.

Implementation of a standardized surgical technique in robot-assisted restorative rectal cancer resection: a single center cohort study

Affiliations

Implementation of a standardized surgical technique in robot-assisted restorative rectal cancer resection: a single center cohort study

Jacob Damgaard Eriksen et al. BMC Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Despite increasing focus on the technical performance of total mesorectal excision over recent decades, anastomotic leakage (AL) continues to be a serious complication for many patients, even in the hands of experienced surgical teams. This study describes implementation of standardized surgical technique in an effort to reduce variability, decrease the risk of anastomotic leakage, and improve associated short-term outcomes for rectal cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted restorative rectal resection (RRR).

Methods: We evaluated all rectal cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted RRR at Aarhus University Hospital between 2017 and 2020. Six standardized surgical steps directed to improve anastomotic healing were mandatory for all RRR. Additional changes were made during the period with prohibition of systemic dexamethasone and limiting the use of endoscopic stapling devices.

Results: The use of the full standardization, including all six surgical steps, increased from 40.3% (95% CI, 0.28-0.54) to 86.2% (95% CI, 0.68-0.95). The incidence of AL decreased from 21.0% (95% CI, 0.12-0.33) to 6.9% (95% CI, 0.01-0.23). Length of hospital stay (LOS) decreased from 6 days (range 2-50) to 5 days (range 2-26). The rate of patients readmitted within 90 days decreased from 21.0% (95% CI, 0.12-0.33), to 6.9% (95% CI, 0.01-0.23).

Conclusion: The full standardization was effectively implemented for rectal cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted RRR. The risk of AL, LOS and readmission decreased during the study period. A team focus on high-reliability and peri-operative complications can improve patient outcomes.

Keywords: Anastomotic leakage; Implementation; Rectal cancer; Robot; Standardization; Surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Timeline of the study period, October 16th 2017—October 14th 2020 with the standardized changes throughout the period with rectal cancer patients undergoing intended robot-assisted restorative rectal resection at Aarhus University Hospital. TME total mesorectal excision, PME partial mesorectal excision
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Rectal cancer patients undergoing restorative rectal resection (RRR) with an intended robot-assisted approach at Aarhus University Hospital (AUH), 2017–2020 and with usage of the standardization

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cancer Today [Internet]. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/home (Accessed: 19 October 2021).
    1. Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RDH. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg. 1982;69(10):613–616. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800691019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schnitzbauer V, Gerken M, Benz S, Völkel V, Draeger T, Fürst A, et al. Laparoscopic and open surgery in rectal cancer patients in Germany: short and long-term results of a large 10-year population-based cohort. Surg Endosc [Internet]. 2020;34(3):1132–1141. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06861-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fleshman J, Branda ME, Sargent DJ, Boller AM, George VV, Abbas MA, et al. Disease-free survival and local recurrence for laparoscopic resection compared with open resection of stage II to III rectal cancer: follow-up results of the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2019;269(4):589–595. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MHGM, de Lange-de Klerk ESM, et al. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(14):1324–1332. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414882. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources