Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 6;12(19):2690.
doi: 10.3390/ani12192690.

Longitudinal Analysis of Antimicrobial Resistance among Enterococcus Species Isolated from Australian Beef Cattle Faeces at Feedlot Entry and Exit

Affiliations

Longitudinal Analysis of Antimicrobial Resistance among Enterococcus Species Isolated from Australian Beef Cattle Faeces at Feedlot Entry and Exit

Yohannes E Messele et al. Animals (Basel). .

Erratum in

Abstract

Enterococcus faecium are commensal bacteria inhabiting the gastrointestinal tract of animals and humans and an important cause of drug-resistant nosocomial infections. This longitudinal study aimed to determine whether changes in the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) phenotype and genotype occurred among Enterococcus spp. isolated from cattle rectal samples obtained at the entry to and exit from an Australian feedlot. The samples obtained at the feedlot induction yielded enterococci (104/150; 69.3%), speciated as E. hirae (90/104; 86.5%), E. faecium (9/104; 8.7%), E. mundtii (3/104; 2.9%), E. durans, and E. casseliflavus (1/104; 1.0% each). AMR was observed to lincomycin (63/104; 60.6%), daptomycin (26/104; 25.0%), nitrofurantoin (9/104; 8.7%), ciprofloxacin (7/104; 6.7%), tetracycline (5/104; 4.8%), tigecycline (4/104; 3.9%), and quinupristin/dalfopristin (3/104; 2.9%). From the rectal swab samples collected at the abattoir from the same animals (i.e., the feedlot exit), the enterococci recovery was significantly higher (144/150; 96.0%), with a marked shift in species distribution dominated by E. faecium (117/144; 81.3%). However, the prevalence of AMR to individual antimicrobials remained largely static between the entry and exit except for the increased resistance to nitrofurantoin (77/144; 53.5%) and quinupristin/dalfopristin (26/144; 18.1%). Overall, 13 AMR genes were observed among the 62 E. faecium isolates. These included aac(6')Ii, aac(6')-Iid, and ant(6)-Ia (aminoglycosides); eatAv, lnu(G), vat(E), msr(C), and erm(B) (macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramins); efmA (fluoroquinolones); and tet(45), tet(L), tet(M), and tet(S) (tetracyclines). The results confirm the presence of fluoroquinolone- and streptogramin-resistant enterococci in cattle faeces at the feedlot entry in the absence of antimicrobial selection pressure. E. faecium, exhibiting increased nitrofurantoin resistance, became the dominant Enterococcus spp. during the feeding period.

Keywords: cattle; microbiology; multidrug resistance; surveillance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prevalence of resistance to 16 antimicrobials observed among Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus hirae isolated from faecal samples obtained at entry to (9 E. faecium; 90 E. hirae) and exit from (117 E. faecium; 25 E. hirae) an Australian feedlot.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Frequency of Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus hirae isolates from feedlot cattle faecal samples at entry and exit to the feedlot.

References

    1. Kirchhelle C. Pharming animals: A global history of antibiotics in food production (1935–2017) Palgrave Commun. 2018;4:96. doi: 10.1057/s41599-018-0152-2. - DOI
    1. Van Boeckel T.P., Brower C., Gilbert M., Grenfell B.T., Levin S.A., Robinson T.P., Teillant A., Laxminarayan R. Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:5649–5654. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1503141112. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Scott A.M., Beller E., Glasziou P., Clark J., Ranakusuma R.W., Byambasuren O., Bakhit M., Page S.W., Trott D., Mar C.D. Is antimicrobial administration to food animals a direct threat to human health? A rapid systematic review. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2018;52:316–323. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.04.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marshall B.M., Levy S.B. Food animals and antimicrobials: Impacts on human health. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2011;24:718–733. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00002-11. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sommer M.O., Dantas G. Antibiotics and the resistant microbiome. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2011;14:556–563. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2011.07.005. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources