Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Sep 23;19(19):12048.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912048.

The Effect of Action Observation Combined with Motor Imagery Training on Upper Extremity Function and Corticospinal Excitability in Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Jong-Bae Choi  1 , Seo-Won Yang  2 , Sung-Ryong Ma  3
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The Effect of Action Observation Combined with Motor Imagery Training on Upper Extremity Function and Corticospinal Excitability in Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Jong-Bae Choi et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effect of motor imagery (MI) intervention with action observation (AO) on upper extremity function and corticospinal activation in stroke patients. MI and AO are two forms of motion simulation that activate the motor system without physical activity. There are many studies that show the effect of AO and MI alone, but there are few studies in parallel. This study was conducted on 45 patients who were divided into an experimental group (n = 22) and a control group (n = 23) using a computer randomization program. The experimental group conducted AO with MI, and the control group only AO. All participants received interventions for twenty-five minutes per session, five times a week, for eight weeks. For the pre- and post-evaluation of all participants, motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude was measured to compare corticospinal activation, and Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA UE), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) and Motor Activity Log (MAL) were evaluated for changes in upper extremity function. In comparing the amount of change before and after the intervention, a significant change was observed in the experimental group's MEP amplitude. In the comparison between groups after the intervention and the amount of change before and after the intervention, the experimental group showed significant changes in FMA UE and MAL Amount of Use (MAL AOU) items. As a result of this study, AO with MI is effective in enhancing upper extremity function and increasing cortical spinal cord activation in patients with severe stroke with limited movement.

Keywords: action observation; corticospinal excitability; motor imagery training; stroke; upper extremity function.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
One of ten activities in AO + MI interventions. (ex: using a mobile phone).
Figure 3
Figure 3
AO + MI intervention.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Demartino A.M., Rodrigues L.C., Gomes R.P., Michaelsen S.M. Hand function and type of grasp used by chronic stroke individuals in actual environment. Top. Stroke Rehabil. 2019;26:247–254. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2019.1591037. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Veldema J., Nowak D.A., Gharabaghi A. Resting motor threshold in the course of hand motor recovery after stroke: A systematic review. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2021;18:158. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00947-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borges L.R., Fernandes A.B., Melo L.P., Guerra R.O., Campos T.F. Action observation for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2018;10:CD011887. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011887.pub2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maida C.D., Norrito R.L., Daidone M., Tuttolomondo A., Pinto A. Neuroinflammatory Mechanisms in Ischemic Stroke: Focus on Cardioembolic Stroke, Background, and Therapeutic Approaches. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:6454. doi: 10.3390/ijms21186454. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosso C., Lamy J.C. Prediction of motor recovery after stroke: Being pragmatic or innovative? Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2020;33:482–487. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000843. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types