Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Oct 5;19(19):12717.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912717.

Environmental Sustainability Impacts of Solid Waste Management Practices in the Global South

Affiliations
Review

Environmental Sustainability Impacts of Solid Waste Management Practices in the Global South

Ismaila Rimi Abubakar et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Solid waste management (SWM) is one of the key responsibilities of city administrators and one of the effective proxies for good governance. Effective SWM mitigates adverse health and environmental impacts, conserves resources, and improves the livability of cities. However, unsustainable SWM practices, exacerbated by rapid urbanization and financial and institutional limitations, negatively impact public health and environmental sustainability. This review article assesses the human and environmental health impacts of SWM practices in the Global South cities that are the future of global urbanization. The study employs desktop research methodology based on in-depth analysis of secondary data and literature, including official documents and published articles. It finds that the commonplace SWM practices include mixing household and commercial garbage with hazardous waste during storage and handling. While waste storage is largely in old or poorly managed facilities such as storage containers, the transportation system is often deficient and informal. The disposal methods are predominantly via uncontrolled dumping, open-air incinerators, and landfills. The negative impacts of such practices include air and water pollution, land degradation, emissions of methane and hazardous leachate, and climate change. These impacts impose significant environmental and public health costs on residents with marginalized social groups mostly affected. The paper concludes with recommendations for mitigating the public and environmental health risks associated with the existing SWM practices in the Global South.

Keywords: climate change; environmental pollution; health effects; land degradation; landfilling; recycling; risk exposure; solid waste management; storage and handling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest in conducting this study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The flow chart of the research method (Source: [18] (p. 4)).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. FAOSTAT Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2013. [(accessed on 14 December 2021)]. Available online: http://faostat3.fao.org/faostat-gateway/go/to/home/E.
    1. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) OECD Environmental Indicators. Development, Measurement and Use. OECD Environment Directorate; Paris, France: 2003. [(accessed on 14 December 2021)]. Available online: http://www.oecd.org/env/
    1. Guerrero L.A., Maas G., Hogland W. Solid waste management challenges for cities in developing countries. Waste Manag. 2013;33:220–232. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.09.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Bank Solid Waste Management. 2018. [(accessed on 9 November 2021)]. Available online: http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/urbandevelopment/brief/solid-waste-man....
    1. UN-Habitat . Solid Waste Management in The World’s Cities: Water and Sanitation in the World’s Cities 2010, United Nations Human Settlements Programme. Earthscan; London, UK: 2010.

LinkOut - more resources