Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 10;19(19):12976.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912976.

Types of Community Support Services and Self-Efficacy for Continuous Community Living among Individuals with Disabilities and Caregivers

Affiliations

Types of Community Support Services and Self-Efficacy for Continuous Community Living among Individuals with Disabilities and Caregivers

Wai Chan et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

This study explored the impacts of five types of community support services (i.e., center-based care, home-based care, respite care, caregiver assistance, and financial subsidies) on self-efficacy for continuous community living among individuals with disabilities and caregivers.

Design: Cross-sectional.

Method: The sample consisted of a group of individuals with disabilities (n = 948) and a group of caregivers (n = 522). A mixed ANOVA was applied to explore the differences in the perceived importance of improvements to community support services between the groups. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the perceived importance of improvements to types of community support services for self-efficacy for continuous community living.

Results: Caregivers perceived higher levels of importance for improvements to community support services than individuals with disabilities. Both groups reported that financial subsidies were the most important area for improvement. The greater importance of improvements to financial subsidies reported by caregivers predicted greater odds for self-efficacy for continuous community living. The greater importance of improvements to center-based services reported by individuals with disabilities predicted greater odds for self-efficacy for continuous community living.

Conclusions: The findings suggested that financial subsidies for caregivers and center-based services for individuals with disabilities could improve self-efficacy for continuous community living.

Keywords: caregivers; center-based services; financial subsidy; individuals with disabilities; self-efficacy for continuous community living.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

    1. Dumont M.P., Dumont D.M. Deinstitutionalization in the United States and Italy: A historical survey. Int. J. Ment. Health. 2008;37:61–70. doi: 10.2753/IMH0020-7411370405. - DOI
    1. United Nations . Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. United Nations; New York, NY, USA: 2006. [(accessed on 17 August 2022)]. Available online: https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf.
    1. Mansell J., Beadle-Brown J., members of the Special Interest Research Group on Comparative Policy and Practice Deinstitutionalisation and community living: Position statement of the Comparative Policy and Practice Special Interest Research Group of the International Association for the Scientific Study of Intellectual Disabilities. J. Intellect. Disabil. Res. 2010;54:104–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01239.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hudson C.G. A model of deinstitutionalization of psychiatric care across 161 nations: 2001–2014. Int. J. Ment. Health. 2016;45:135–153. doi: 10.1080/00207411.2016.1167489. - DOI
    1. Jones J.L., Gallus K.L. Understanding deinstitutionalization: What families value and desire in the transition to community living. Res. Pract. Pers. Sev. Disabil. 2016;41:116–131. doi: 10.1177/1540796916637050. - DOI

Publication types