Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Oct 2;23(19):11684.
doi: 10.3390/ijms231911684.

TCGA Molecular Prognostic Groups of Endometrial Carcinoma: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives

Affiliations
Review

TCGA Molecular Prognostic Groups of Endometrial Carcinoma: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives

Damiano Arciuolo et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

The four TCGA-based molecular prognostic groups of endometrial carcinoma (EC), i.e., POLE-mutant, mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient, p53-abnormal, and “no specific molecular profile” (NSMP), have recently been integrated into ESGO-ESTRO-ESP guidelines. The POLE-mutant and MMR-deficient groups are associated with high mutational load, morphological heterogeneity, and inflammatory infiltration. These groups are frequent in high-grade endometrioid, undifferentiated/dedifferentiated, and mixed histotypes. POLE-mutant ECs show good prognosis and do not require adjuvant treatment, although the management of cases at stage >II is still undefined. MMR-deficient ECs show intermediate prognosis and are currently substratified based on clinicopathological variables, some of which might not have prognostic value. These groups may benefit from immunotherapy. P53-mutant ECs are typically high-grade and often morphologically ambiguous, accounting for virtually all serous ECs, most carcinosarcomas and mixed ECs, and half of clear-cell ECs. They show poor prognosis and are treated with chemoradiotherapy; a subset may benefit from HER2 inhibitors or PARP inhibitors. The NSMP group is the most frequent TCGA group; its prognosis is highly variable and affected by clinicopathological/molecular factors, most of which are still under evaluation. In conclusion, the TCGA classification has improved diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of EC. Further studies are needed to resolve the points of uncertainty that still exist.

Keywords: POLE; TCGA; endometrial carcinoma; histotype; microsatellite; mismatch-repair; molecular; p53; prognosis; treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Levine D.A., Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Nature. 2013;497:67–73. doi: 10.1038/nature12113. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board . Female Genital Tumours. 5th ed. Volume 4 International Agency for Research on Cancer; Lyon, France: 2020. (WHO Classification of Tumours Series).
    1. McAlpine J., Leon-Castillo A., Bosse T. The rise of a novel classification system for endometrial carcinoma; integration of molecular subclasses. J. Pathol. 2018;244:538–549. doi: 10.1002/path.5034. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Santoro A., Angelico G., Travaglino A., Inzani F., Arciuolo D., Valente M., D’Alessandris N., Scaglione G., Fiorentino V., Raffone A., et al. New Pathological and Clinical Insights in Endometrial Cancer in View of the Updated ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines. Cancers. 2021;13:2623. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112623. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Talhouk A., McConechy M.K., Leung S., Li-Chang H.H., Kwon J.S., Melnyk N., Yang W., Senz J., Boyd N., Karnezis A.N., et al. A clinically applicable molecular-based classification for endometrial cancers. Br. J. Cancer. 2015;113:299–310. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.190. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances