Predicting the Recurrence of Gastric Cancer Using the Textural Features of Perigastric Adipose Tissue on [18F]FDG PET/CT
- PMID: 36233285
- PMCID: PMC9569486
- DOI: 10.3390/ijms231911985
Predicting the Recurrence of Gastric Cancer Using the Textural Features of Perigastric Adipose Tissue on [18F]FDG PET/CT
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the relationship between the histopathological and textural features of perigastric adipose tissue (AT) on 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and to evaluate the prognostic significance of perigastric AT textural features in predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with gastric cancer. Sixty-nine patients with gastric cancer who underwent staging [18F]FDG PET/CT and subsequent curative surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Textural features of perigastric AT were extracted from PET images. On histopathological analysis, CD4, CD8, and CD163 cell infiltration and matrix metalloproteinase-11 and interleukin-6 (IL-6) expression in perigastric AT were graded. The degree of CD163 cell infiltration in perigastric AT was significantly correlated with the mean standardized uptake value (SUV), SUV histogram entropy, grey-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) energy, and GLCM entropy of perigastric AT. The degree of IL-6 expression in the perigastric AT was significantly correlated with the mean and median SUVs of perigastric AT. In multivariate survival analysis, GLCM entropy, GLCM dissimilarity, and GLCM homogeneity of perigastric AT were significant predictors of RFS. The textural features of perigastric AT on [18F]FDG PET/CT significantly correlated with inflammatory response in perigastric AT and were significant prognostic factors for predicting RFS in patients with gastric cancer.
Keywords: F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose; adipose tissue; positron emission tomography; stomach neoplasm; textural feature.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures
References
-
- Guo J., Xu A., Sun X., Zhao X., Xia Y., Rao H., Zhang Y., Zhang R., Chen L., Zhang T., et al. Three-year outcomes of the randomized phase III SEIPLUS trial of extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage for locally advanced gastric cancer. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:6598. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26778-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Qiu W.-W., Chen Q.-Y., Zheng W.-Z., He Q.-C., Huang Z.-N., Xie J.-W., Wang J.-B., Lin J.-X., Lu J., Cao L.-L., et al. Postoperative follow-up for gastric cancer needs to be individualized according to age, tumour recurrence pattern, and recurrence time. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2022;48:1790–1798. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.02.025. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
