Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 5;11(19):5881.
doi: 10.3390/jcm11195881.

COVID-19 CPR-Impact of Personal Protective Equipment during a Simulated Cardiac Arrest in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Prospective Comparative Trial

Affiliations

COVID-19 CPR-Impact of Personal Protective Equipment during a Simulated Cardiac Arrest in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Prospective Comparative Trial

Timur Sellmann et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Background: Guidelines of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) recommend the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) during the resuscitation of COVID-19 patients. Data on the effects of PPE on rescuers’ stress level and quality of CPR are sparse and conflicting. This trial investigated the effects of PPE on team performance in simulated cardiac arrests. Methods: During the pandemic period, 198 teams (689 participants) performed CPR with PPE in simulated cardiac arrests (PPE group) and were compared with 423 (1451 participants) performing in identical scenarios in the pre-pandemic period (control group). Video recordings were used for data analysis. The primary endpoint was hands-on time. Secondary endpoints included a further performance of CPR and the perceived task load assessed by the NASA task-load index. Results: Hands-on times were lower in PPE teams than in the control group (86% (83−89) vs. 90% (87−93); difference 3, 95% CI for difference 3−4, p < 0.0001). Moreover, PPE teams made fewer change-overs and delayed defibrillation and administration of drugs. PPE teams perceived higher task loads (57 (44−67) vs. 63 (53−71); difference 6, 95% CI for difference 5−8, p < 0.0001) and scored higher in the domains physical and temporal demand, performance, and effort. Leadership allocation had no effect on primary and secondary endpoints. Conclusions: Having to wear PPE during CPR is an additional burden in an already demanding task. PPE is associated with an increase in perceived task load, lower hands-on times, fewer change-overs, and delays in defibrillation and the administration of drugs. (German study register number DRKS00023184).

Keywords: COVID-19; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; controlled trial; personal protective equipment; simulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Box and whisker plot of the percentage hands-on time. Boxes represent medians and interquartile range; whiskers delineate the 5th and 95th percentile respectively. Outlier markers indicate teams performing outside the 5th and 95th percentile. White box = control group (no PPE); grey box = group performing CPR with PPE. Hands-on times differed significantly between the groups (p < 0.0001).

References

    1. Kundra P., Vinayagam S. COVID-19 cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Guidelines and modifications. J. Anaesthesiol. Clin. Pharm. 2020;36:S39–S44. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_257_20. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nolan J.P., Monsieurs K.G., Bossaert L., Bottiger B.W., Greif R., Lott C., Madar J., Olasveengen T.M., Roehr C.C., Semeraro F., et al. European Resuscitation Council COVID-19 guidelines executive summary. Resuscitation. 2020;153:45–55. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.06.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization . Rational Use of Personal Protective Equipment for Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) and Considerations during Severe Shortages: Interim Guidance, 6 April 2020. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2020. WHO/2019-nCov/IPC_PPE_use/2020.3.
    1. Couper K., Taylor-Phillips S., Grove A., Freeman K., Osokogu O., Court R., Mehrabian A., Morley P.T., Nolan J.P., Soar J., et al. COVID-19 in cardiac arrest and infection risk to rescuers: A systematic review. Resuscitation. 2020;151:59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.04.022. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lim Z.J., Ponnapa Reddy M., Afroz A., Billah B., Shekar K., Subramaniam A. Incidence and outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in the COVID-19 era: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2020;157:248–258. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.10.025. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources