Antioxidant Effects of Bioactive Glasses (BGs) and Their Significance in Tissue Engineering Strategies
- PMID: 36235178
- PMCID: PMC9573515
- DOI: 10.3390/molecules27196642
Antioxidant Effects of Bioactive Glasses (BGs) and Their Significance in Tissue Engineering Strategies
Abstract
Elevated levels of oxidative stress are usually observed following injuries, leading to impaired tissue repair due to oxidation-related chronic inflammation. Several attempts have been made to manage this unfavorable situation, and the use of biomaterials with antioxidant activity is showing great promise in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine approaches. Bioactive glasses (BGs) are a versatile group of inorganic substances that exhibit an outstanding regenerative capacity for both hard and soft damaged tissues. The chemical composition of BGs provides a great opportunity for imparting specific biological activities to them. On this point, BGs may easily become antioxidant substances through simple physicochemical modifications. For example, particular antioxidant elements (mostly cerium (Ce)) can be added to the basic composition of the glasses. On the other hand, grafting natural antioxidant substances (e.g., polyphenols) on the BG surface is feasible for making antioxidant substitutes with promising results in vitro. Mesoporous BGs (MBGs) were demonstrated to have unique merits compared with melt-derived BGs since they make it possible to load antioxidants and deliver them to the desired locations. However, there are actually limited in vivo experimental studies on the capability of modified BGs for scavenging free radicals (e.g., reactive oxygen species (ROS)). Therefore, more research is required to determine the actual potential of BGs in decreasing oxidative stress and subsequently improving tissue repair and regeneration. The present work aims to highlight the potential of different types of BGs in modulating oxidative stress and subsequently improving tissue healing.
Keywords: bioactive glasses (BGs); free radicals; oxidative stress; tissue engineering; wound healing.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Nazarnezhad S., Kermani F., Askari V.R., Hosseini S.A., Ebrahimzadeh-Bideskan A., Moradi A., Oskuee R.K., Mollazadeh S., Kargozar S. Preparation and Characterization of Platelet Lysate (Pl)-Loaded Electrospun Nanofibers for Epidermal Wound Healing. J. Pharm. Sci. 2022;111:2531–2539. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2022.04.008. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dunnill C., Patton T., Brennan J., Barrett J., Dryden M., Cooke J., Leaper D., Georgopoulos N.T. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and wound healing: The functional role of ROS and emerging ROS-modulating technologies for augmentation of the healing process. Int. Wound J. 2017;14:89–96. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12557. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Kermani F., Mollazadeh S., Kargozar S., Vahdati Khakhi J. Improved osteogenesis and angiogenesis of theranostic ions doped calcium phosphates (CaPs) by a simple surface treatment process: A state-of-the-art study. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2021;124:112082. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112082. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
