Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 22;22(19):7197.
doi: 10.3390/s22197197.

Robotic Biofeedback for Post-Stroke Gait Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review

Affiliations

Robotic Biofeedback for Post-Stroke Gait Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review

Cristiana Pinheiro et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

This review aims to recommend directions for future research on robotic biofeedback towards prompt post-stroke gait rehabilitation by investigating the technical and clinical specifications of biofeedback systems (BSs), including the complementary use with assistive devices and/or physiotherapist-oriented cues. A literature search was conducted from January 2019 to September 2022 on Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, PEDro, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Data regarding technical (sensors, biofeedback parameters, actuators, control strategies, assistive devices, physiotherapist-oriented cues) and clinical (participants' characteristics, protocols, outcome measures, BSs' effects) specifications of BSs were extracted from the relevant studies. A total of 31 studies were reviewed, which included 660 stroke survivors. Most studies reported visual biofeedback driven according to the comparison between real-time kinetic or spatiotemporal data from wearable sensors and a threshold. Most studies achieved statistically significant improvements on sensor-based and clinical outcomes between at least two evaluation time points. Future research should study the effectiveness of using multiple wearable sensors and actuators to provide personalized biofeedback to users with multiple sensorimotor deficits. There is space to explore BSs complementing different assistive devices and physiotherapist-oriented cues according to their needs. There is a lack of randomized-controlled studies to explore post-stroke stage, mental and sensory effects of BSs.

Keywords: biofeedback mode; biofeedback parameter; human sensing; motor recovery; robotics rehabilitation; sensorimotor augmentation; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of search strategy based on PRISMA.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Luengo-Fernandez R., Leal J., Candio P., Violato M., Stroke Alliance for Europe Economic Impact of Stroke. 2019. [(accessed on 24 April 2020)]. Available online: https://www.safestroke.eu/economic-impact-of-stroke/
    1. Johnson C.O., Nguyen M., Roth G.A., Nichols E., Alam T., Abate D., Abd-Allah F., Abdelalim A., Abraha H.N., Abu-Rmeileh N.M., et al. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:439–458. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30034-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wolf S.L. Electromyographic Biofeedback Applications to Stroke Patients. Phys. Ther. 1983;63:1448–1459. doi: 10.1093/ptj/63.9.1448. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Huang H., Wolf S.L., He J. Recent developments in biofeedback for neuromotor rehabilitation. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2006;3:11. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-3-11. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. FlintRehab Neuroplasticity After Stroke: The Single Most Important Key to Recovery. 2018. [(accessed on 27 May 2019)]. Available online: https://www.flintrehab.com/2018/neuroplasticity-after-stroke/

Publication types