Robotic Biofeedback for Post-Stroke Gait Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review
- PMID: 36236303
- PMCID: PMC9573595
- DOI: 10.3390/s22197197
Robotic Biofeedback for Post-Stroke Gait Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review
Abstract
This review aims to recommend directions for future research on robotic biofeedback towards prompt post-stroke gait rehabilitation by investigating the technical and clinical specifications of biofeedback systems (BSs), including the complementary use with assistive devices and/or physiotherapist-oriented cues. A literature search was conducted from January 2019 to September 2022 on Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, PEDro, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Data regarding technical (sensors, biofeedback parameters, actuators, control strategies, assistive devices, physiotherapist-oriented cues) and clinical (participants' characteristics, protocols, outcome measures, BSs' effects) specifications of BSs were extracted from the relevant studies. A total of 31 studies were reviewed, which included 660 stroke survivors. Most studies reported visual biofeedback driven according to the comparison between real-time kinetic or spatiotemporal data from wearable sensors and a threshold. Most studies achieved statistically significant improvements on sensor-based and clinical outcomes between at least two evaluation time points. Future research should study the effectiveness of using multiple wearable sensors and actuators to provide personalized biofeedback to users with multiple sensorimotor deficits. There is space to explore BSs complementing different assistive devices and physiotherapist-oriented cues according to their needs. There is a lack of randomized-controlled studies to explore post-stroke stage, mental and sensory effects of BSs.
Keywords: biofeedback mode; biofeedback parameter; human sensing; motor recovery; robotics rehabilitation; sensorimotor augmentation; stroke.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Luengo-Fernandez R., Leal J., Candio P., Violato M., Stroke Alliance for Europe Economic Impact of Stroke. 2019. [(accessed on 24 April 2020)]. Available online: https://www.safestroke.eu/economic-impact-of-stroke/
-
- Johnson C.O., Nguyen M., Roth G.A., Nichols E., Alam T., Abate D., Abd-Allah F., Abdelalim A., Abraha H.N., Abu-Rmeileh N.M., et al. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:439–458. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30034-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- FlintRehab Neuroplasticity After Stroke: The Single Most Important Key to Recovery. 2018. [(accessed on 27 May 2019)]. Available online: https://www.flintrehab.com/2018/neuroplasticity-after-stroke/
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
