Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 27:13:987985.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.987985. eCollection 2022.

Estimates of genotypic and phenotypic variance, heritability, and genetic advance of horticultural traits in developed crosses of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp)

Haitham E M Zaki  1   2 , Khlode S A Radwan  3
Affiliations

Estimates of genotypic and phenotypic variance, heritability, and genetic advance of horticultural traits in developed crosses of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp)

Haitham E M Zaki et al. Front Plant Sci. .

Abstract

Cowpea, in addition to being a food and feed crop, plays a key role in sustainable farming. The present study's goal is to develop new high-yielding cowpea varieties. A Field experiment was carried out across 3 summer seasons and the breeding program included 28 distinct cowpea varieties, out of which five potential parents were selected for this investigation. Local cultivars, i.e., Cream 7 'Cr7', Dokki 331 'D331', Commercial 1 'Com1', and introduced cultivars, i.e., Colossus 'Col' and Asian Introduction 'AI' were utilized to produce six crosses in two generations apart; F1 and F2: Col x AI, Col x Com1, Cr7 x AI, Cr7 x Com1, D331 x AI, and D331 x Com1. 'AI' and 'Com1' were superior in pod length, pod diameter, number of seeds/pod and seeds weight/pod, whereas 'Col', 'Cr7' and 'D331' were superior in seeds yield/plant, number of pods/plant and the least number of aborted ovules/pod. The genotypes/crosses showed greater genotypic variance (GV) than phenotypic variance (PV) for number of pods/plant, pod length, number of seeds/pod, number of aborted ovules/pod, fresh pod weight, seeds weight/pod, and seeds yield/plant. All studied variables showed high heritability (H%) in genotypes/crosses, despite the exception of seeds weight/pod, which ranged from 29.14 in 'D331' to 83.7 in F2 of Col x Com1. F2 plants and their parents' genotypes showed greater H%. Cr7 x AI developed the most H%, 99.04% for number of pods/plant. D331 x Com1 and Cr7 x AI exhibited moderate H% for fresh pod weight in F1, but all other crosses had high H%. F1 and F2 crosses yielded moderate to high GCV and PCV for number of seeds/pod. Variations in parental genotypes and crossings reflect genetic diversity and the possibility of selection. Crossing with 'AI,' and 'Com1' genotypes enhanced the performance of the other varieties, 'Col', 'D331' and 'Cr7'. Cr7 x Com1 and D331 x AI were selected as the most promising crosses for cowpea breeding programs.

Keywords: cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.); cowpea crosses; genotypic variance; heritability; phenotypic variance; pod traits; yield and yield components.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) flower traits, (B) peduncle length, (C) pod traits and (D) seed traits of five different cowpea parental genotypes examined under current investigation, i.e., and Asian Introduction, Colossus cv., Commercial 1, Cream 7 cv., and Dokki 331.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The diversification of seed characteristics of the parental genotypes, F1 and F2 of the crosses, (A) Colossus cv. x Asian Introduction, (B) Colossus cv. x Commercial 1and (C) Cream 7 cv. x Asian Introduction.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The diversification of seed characteristics of the parental genotypes, F1 and F2 of the crosses, (A) Cream 7 cv. x Commercial 1, (B) Dokki 331 cv. x Asian Introduction and (C) Dokki 331 cv. x Commercial 1.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Adewale B. D., Adeigbe O. O., Aremu C. O. (2011). Genetic distance and diversity among some cowpea (Vigna unguiculata l. walp) genotypes. Int. J. Res. Plant Sci. 1 (2), 9–14. doi: 10.1155/2016/8956412 - DOI
    1. Ajayi A. T., Adekola M. O., Taiwo B. H., Azuh V. O. (2014. a). Character expression and differences in yield potential of ten genotypes of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata l. Walp). Int. J. Plant Res. 4 (3), 63–71. doi: 10.5923/j.plant.20140403.01 - DOI
    1. Ajayi A. T., Osekita O. S., Osaghae S. O. (2014. b). Variability among some accessions of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata l. walp) in Nigeria on the expression of quantitative traits. FUTA. J. Res. Sci. 1), 26–34. doi: 10.5923/j.plant.20140403.01 - DOI
    1. Allen O. N., Allen E. K. (1981). The leguminosae: a source book of characteristics, uses and nodulation (Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press; ).
    1. Animasaun D. A., Oyedeji S., Azeez Y. K., Mustapha O. T., Azeez M. A. (2015). Genetic variability study among ten cultivars of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata l walp) using morpho-agronomic traits and nutritional composition. J. Agric. Sci. 10, 119–130. doi: 10.4038/jas.v10i2.8057 - DOI