Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 1;91(6):831-841.
doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002147. Epub 2022 Oct 14.

A Systematic Review of Neuropsychological Outcomes After Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms

Affiliations

A Systematic Review of Neuropsychological Outcomes After Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms

Mohamed Nasra et al. Neurosurgery. .

Abstract

Background: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is a cause of profound morbidity and mortality. Its effects extend beyond functional neurological status to neurocognitive and psychological functioning. Endovascular treatment is becoming more prevalent after increasing evidence for its safety and efficacy; however, there is a relative paucity of evidence specific to neurocognitive status after treatment.

Objective: To assess and compare neuropsychological outcomes after the treatment of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted searching for articles assessing the neuropsychological and cognitive outcomes after the treatment of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Inclusion criteria were English language, publication between January 2000 and October 2020, and discussion of neuropsychological outcomes in adequate detail. Outcomes were categorized into 8 domains: 5 Neurocognitive (Language, Executive Function, Complex Attention, Memory and Learning, and Perceptual motor function), Intelligence Quotient, Affect, and Quality of Life.

Results: Twenty-four articles were included comprising 2236 patients (924 surgical clipping, 1095 endovascular coiling, and 217 controls). These studies reported that most tests revealed no significant difference [n = 356/421 (84.56%)] between treatment modalities. More studies reported significantly superior test scores in the fields of language, executive function, and memory and learning after coiling [n = 53/421 tests (12.59%)] compared with clipping [n = 12/421 tests (2.85%)].

Conclusion: The current available data and published studies demonstrate a trend toward improved neurocognitive and psychological outcomes after endovascular treatment. Although these findings should be considered when deciding on the optimal treatment method for each patient, drawing definitive conclusions is difficult because of heterogeneity between patients and studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Beeckmans K, Crunelle CL, Van den Bossche J, et al. Cognitive outcome after surgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage due to ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysm. Acta Neurol Belg. 2020;120(1):123-132.
    1. Bellebaum C, Schäfers L, Schoch B, et al. Clipping versus coiling: neuropsychological follow up after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2004;26(8):1081-1092.
    1. Bründl E, Böhm C, Lürding R, et al. Treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms and cognitive performance: preliminary results of a prospective clinical trial. World Neurosurg. 2016;94:145-156.
    1. Bründl E, Schödel P, Bele S, et al. Treatment of spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage and self-reported neuropsychological performance at 6 months—results of a prospective clinical pilot study on good-grade patients. Turk Neurosurg. 2018;28(3):369-388.
    1. Caveney AF, Langenecker SA, Pandey AS, et al. Neuropsychological changes in patients undergoing treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2019;84(3):581-587.

Publication types